Is It Cost Effective to Obtain Fungal and Acid-Fast Bacillus Cultures during Spine Debridement?

Article information

Abstract

Introduction

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are relatively uncommon complications after spinal surgery, with a reported incidence of 2.1% based on a database study of 108,419 patients [1]. However, spine SSIs are associated with significant morbidity and can result in catastrophic outcomes for patients. Risk factors for SSI have been well documented and include modifiable patient-related risk factors (i.e., body mass index [BMI], diabetes, malnutrition, and tobacco use) and non-modifiable risk factors (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, revision surgery, and age) [2–5]. Identifying and mitigating these risk factors are crucial for providers, as spine SSIs cost twice as many healthcare dollars as uninfected cases ($37,009 versus $16,227) with cost per quality-adjusted life year exceeding three times that of uninfected patients ($185,045 versus $55,955) [6]. As such, SSI prevention has a tremendous benefit to patients and the healthcare system. Bacterial infections in the spine have been well characterized such that preventative strategies have been developed and implemented. However, fungal SSIs have not been well delineated with respect to their incidence and risk factors. Clinical characterization of fungal SSIs is critical for developing more effective preventative and management strategies.

When performing spine irrigation and debridement (I&D), the typical clinical mantra is to obtain samples for microbial cultures, fungal cultures, and acid-fast bacillus (AFB) cultures. However, this approach is not based on robust data to support its clinical utility or cost-effectiveness. Therefore, the present study was initiated to determine the relative incidence and cost-effectiveness of performing anaerobic, fungal, and AFB cultures for each patient undergoing spine I&D at the University of Missouri. The study was designed to test the hypothesis that the universal performance of fungal and AFB cultures would be cost effective based on the culture costs relative to the costs of missing these infections. The experimental design allowed for (1) identifying the incidence of fungal and AFB infections in this patient cohort, (2) comparing the incidence of fungal and AFB infections in cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine segments, (3) characterizing relevant risk factors for fungal and AFB SSIs, and (4) determining the cost of requesting cultures for all patients who undergo spinal I&D procedures.

Materials and Methods

Results

A total of 254 patients were identified, of whom 52 were excluded. All of these 52 patients were excluded because no culture samples were sent to the lab due to the assumption of a lack of infection. The cohort used for all analyses was therefore composed of 202 patients undergoing 271 spine I&Ds (Table 1). The average age was 53.1±15.9 years, with 51.5% identifying as female. For the majority of patients (77.4%), the I&D was performed at the site of a previous spine surgery, whereas the I&D was the first spine surgery for 46 (22.6%) of the 202 patients. Overall, 28 patients had two spine I&Ds, 10 had three I&Ds, and seven patients had four I&Ds.

Table 1

Demographics of patients with positive fungal culture compared to negative fungal cultures

Eight patients had spine fungal infections with a total of 10 positive cultures due to one patient having three consecutive positive fungal cultures. One patient had a concomitant AFB infection. The fungal SSI rate was 4% and the AFB SSI rate was 0.49% for this patient population. Interestingly, only six of these patients were treated with antifungals. Patients were determined to have cleared the infection once serial inflammatory markers showed a declining trend and there was no further purulence or other signs of infection during the spine debridement. This happened after the inclusion of the antifungal regimen in all six of the patients who were treated with antifungals. The two patients not treated with antifungals had concomitant bacterial SSIs and were treated with appropriate antibiotics. Of the remaining six patients treated with antifungals, one had concomitant multimicrobial bacterial SSI and AFB SSI, one had a concomitant methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus infection, and the remaining four had isolated fungal SSIs. None of the patients with positive fungal cultures were readmitted to the hospital for continued spine infection after treatment and subsequent hospital discharge. Patient follow-up after hospital discharge was recorded if they saw either the patient’s primary physician or a spine attending and averaged 21 months (range, 8–45 months). One patient died after 8 months due to medical factors unrelated to the spine infection. There were no significant differences with respect to age (p=0.94) or sex (p=1.00) between patients with and without fungal SSIs.

With respect to risk factors associated with spine fungal SSIs, use of oral steroids was strongly associated with obtaining a positive fungal culture (odds ratio, 5.62; 95% confidence interval, 1.33–23.75). No other assessed comorbidities were significantly associated with a fungal SSI (Table 2); however, the association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was almost statistically significant (p=0.05). The rate of obtaining a positive fungal culture increased with each subsequent I&D; however, this association was also not statistically significant (p=0.07) (Table 3). Further, there were no statistically significant associations with positive fungal cultures and I&D location (i.e., in the cervical, thoracic, thoracolumbar, or lumbar/lumbosacral region of the spine) (Table 4).

Table 2

Relationship of comorbidities to positive fungal infections

Table 3

Rate of infections based on number of spine I&D procedures

Table 4

Rate of fungal infection based on location of spine I&D

The average physician fees alone, without accounting for facility fees during hospital admission, for spine I&D with culture were $19,409, with total average physician fees for inpatient care at $20,257 and outpatient care at $2,440.62. Both physician fees and facility costs were then separately tabulated for the eight patients with fungal infection. The average cost for each patient with a fungal infection was $161,875.67 in facility costs and $27,977.87 in physician fees (Table 5).

Table 5

Relative costs of universal performance of fungal testing versus total costs (physician fees and facility costs) for missed fungal infections

Additionally, we considered a scenario in which no infections were missed, all patients had cultures, and patient treatment was guided by culture results (our current practice). Conversely, we also considered a scenario in which no cultures were taken and all patients had a missed fungal infection requiring subsequent readmission to the hospital. The difference in the associated costs, minus the reimbursed Medicare cost, was used as the calculated cost savings for our healthcare system. This was calculated to be $1,406,229.52.

Discussion

The results of the present review of medical record data from patients undergoing spine I&D at our orthopedic hospital over a 10-year period revealed a 4% incidence of fungal SSIs and a 0.49% incidence of AFB SSIs. Oral steroid use was associated with a five times higher likelihood of positive fungal and AFB cultures. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the likelihood of obtaining positive fungal cultures based on the anatomical location of the I&D within the spine. We were able to determine that the financial burden to our healthcare system is substantially smaller if fungal cultures are obtained for all patients at every I&D over a 10-year period ($12,151.58) than if no fungal cultures are obtained leading to missed infections requiring treatment (cumulative cost for all patients of $1,418,381.10). This indicates that fungal cultures can be considered cost effective and may decrease morbidity and the fiscal burden of not identifying fungal infections.

Spine infections are associated with significant morbidity and costs. Spine bacterial SSIs have been studied extensively; however, there has been minimal research guiding best practice management of when to determine if a patient should have a fungal culture sent to microbiology. The most relevant data available relate to fungal and AFB cultures from aseptic total joint revisions, which were associated with reported “false positive” rates of 1.6% for fungus and 0.5% for AFB [7]. The 4% incidence of positive fungal cultures for spine SSIs in the present study is much higher than the rate of false positives reported by Tokarski et al. [7]. However, it is possible that at least two of our positive fungal cultures were false positives based on the apparent resolution of the SSI without antifungal treatment or further procedures. The 0.49% incidence of positive AFB cultures for spine SSIs in the present study matches the AFB false positive rate reported by Tokarski et al. [7] for aseptic total joint revisions. Although the patient was treated with long-term antibiotics for a presumed atypical mycobacterial infection, the patient also had three consecutive positive fungal cultures and consecutive positive polymicrobial bacterial cultures. As such, it seems plausible that the single AFB culture was a false positive.

In general, the common practice for spine surgeons when performing spine I&D is to obtain samples for microbial cultures and “send for everything.” Spine SSIs are associated with tremendous costs [6], such that identification of risk factors, prevention, and mitigation of costs for these infections are critically important to patients and the healthcare system. Risk factors for bacterial SSIs have been well documented and include modifiable patient-related risk factors (i.e., BMI, diabetes, malnutrition, and tobacco use) and non-modifiable risk factors (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis, revision surgery, and age) [2–5]. While oral steroid use was the only risk factor identified as having a significant association with the presence of fungal spine infection in this study, the risk factors associated with bacterial SSI should still be considered until more definitive data are available.

Our finding of an increased risk for fungal infections with steroid use aligns with previous literature identifying steroid use as a risk factor for such infections [8]. However, owing to the substantial patient morbidity and the tremendous financial burden associated with missing an infection, we recommend obtaining fungal cultures in all patients undergoing spine I&D regardless of their risk factors. At institutions with very low levels of AFB infection, the rate of false positive AFB infections may be greater than the rate of true AFB infections. In these instances, it may not be cost effective to send for AFB culture for patients with a suspected spine infection.

There are limitations that should be considered when interpreting and applying the results of the present study. First, we excluded 52 patients, representing 20.5% of our study population, due to no cultures being sent to microbiology. Since these patients did not undergo additional surgeries, it can likely be safely assumed that these were uninfected cases. This does falsely elevate the proposed effectiveness of sending fungal cultures for each I&D. However, owing to the low overall costs of obtaining fungal cultures, this would not change the outcome on whether it is cost effective to obtain fungal cultures. In fact, this would strengthen our argument that AFB cultures are unlikely to be cost effective in areas with low endemic rates of AFB. In addition, our methods for estimating the cost of a missed fungal infection requiring subsequent treatment are likely at the upper limit of what a missed infection would cost. However, the total cost to our healthcare system of obtaining fungal cultures over a 10-year period ($12,151.58) is well below the average combined physician’s fee ($19,409) for a single patient requiring spine debridement. Further, costs across the period of study were not adjusted for inflation and only current costs for cultures were considered. Finally, the numbers of spine fungal and AFB infections identified at our Midwest university hospital were low and hospitals with larger numbers of fungal or AFB infections may identify additional risk factors for identifying spine fungal and AFB infections. However, even with these limitations, our data appear to definitively support obtaining fungal cultures in all patients undergoing spine I&D regardless of their risk factors. The utility of obtaining routine AFB cultures is dependent on the endemic rates of AFB.

Conclusions

Our retrospective medical record-based review demonstrated that it is cost effective to send for fungal cultures during each spine I&D. Over a 10-year period at our institution, the costs of sending for fungal cultures would amount to a hospital cost of $12,151.58 compared with $1,418,381.10 if all fungal infections were missed and required subsequent treatment. The use of steroids was a risk factor for obtaining positive fungal cultures, while COPD (p=0.05) and each subsequent I&D (p=0.07) trended toward significance for identifying a fungal infection. The data regarding AFB cultures are less clear. The rate of previously reported false positive AFB cultures in aseptic total joint revisions mirrors the rate of AFB-positive cultures found in our cohort of patients undergoing spine debridement. Therefore, sending for AFB cultures is unlikely to be cost effective in patients requiring spine I&D at institutions with low endemic rates of AFB.

Article information Continued