Asian Spine J Search

CLOSE


Asian Spine J > Volume 13(3); 2019 > Article
Kaliya-Perumal, Limthongkul, and Oh: Utilization of Spinal Navigation to Facilitate Hassle-Free Rod Placement during Minimally-Invasive Long-Construct Posterior Instrumentation

Abstract

During minimally-invasive long-construct posterior instrumentation, it may be challenging to contour and place the rod as the screw heads are not visualized. To overcome this, we utilized the image data merging (IDM) facility of our spinal navigation system to visualize a coherent whole image of the construct throughout the procedure. Here, we describe this technique that was used for a patient in whom L1–L5 posterior instrumentation was performed. Using an IDM facility, screws are color coded and after placement, the final image is saved. Saved images of all previous screws are displayed and observed while placing the subsequent screws. Therefore, the entry point, depth, and mediolateral alignment of subsequent screws can be adjusted to fall in line with previous screws such that the rod can be placed without hassle. Moreover, final adjustments to the construct are kept to a minimum. The possibility of screw pullout due to force engaging the rod on poorly aligned screws is thus avoided.

Introduction

During posterior instrumentation via open approach, contouring and placement of the rod is relatively straightforward as the screw heads can be seen throughout the procedure. Therefore, the surgeon is always mindful about screw head position such that they are lined up to accommodate final rod placement [1-3]. However, during minimally-invasive long-construct procedures, this is not possible as the screw heads are hidden from the surgeon’s view. Thus, the surgeon may take longer to measure the appropriate rod length, require multiple fluoroscopic images, and also risks the possibility of screw pullout if the screws are not aligned properly and the rod is force engaged [4]. With the advances in spinal navigation for minimally-invasive spine surgery, we have managed to overcome this problem by a technique of image data merging (IDM) that will allow smooth insertion of the rod during navigated minimally-invasive posterior instrumentation. The technique and its surgical pearls are described below.

Technical Note

In this case, a minimally-invasive posterior instrumented fusion was performed from L1–L5. Firstly, the patient was made to lay in prone position on a Jackson table. A stab incision was made over the spinous process of T12, followed by, clamping of reference frame to the spinous process. Then, the O-arm (Medtronic StealthStation S8 surgical navigation system; Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) was brought in for a reference spin. Subsequently, a midline incision was made through the skin, whereas stab incisions were made through the fascia for the pedicle screws. A navigated awl and tap were used to prepare the pedicle for the L1 screw on one side, and then the screw was inserted (Fig. 1). This technique of navigated pedicle screw insertion is similar to other techniques described in the literature [5].
Planning for a hassle-free rod placement begins with the first inserted pedicle screw. We utilized the IDM facility of our navigation system to save a color coded virtual image of the first inserted L1 screw along with its screw head (Fig. 1). This serves as the reference for subsequent screws. Next, the L2 screw was inserted on the same side, considering the mediolateral trajectory and depth to keep this screw head in line with the previous screw (Fig. 2). Color coded virtual images of all previously placed screws were projected in the navigation display monitor while placing the subsequent screws, i.e., when the L4 screw was inserted, images of the L2 and L3 screws were displayed. The L4 screw was adjusted accordingly such that it lined up with the other screws to achieve the desired lordosis. The same procedure was repeated until all screws were inserted.
Once all screws from L1 to L5 were in place, virtual images of the screws were merged and displayed to plan the contour of the rod (Fig. 3). The same can be done separately for each side. From this merged projection, we were able to perform the following tasks: (1) check the depth of the screw heads, (2) check whether the screw heads line up in the mediolateral plane, (3) estimate lordosis to contour the rod, and (4) measure the length (in mm) of the rod. After contouring (Fig. 4), the rod placement was performed in a regular fashion by tunneling through the facia and secured accordingly. Postoperative X-rays were taken to check the placement of the rod.

Discussion

Navigation-assisted minimally-invasive posterior instrumentation of the spine is gaining popularity owing to its multiple advantages and the field is constantly evolving [6-11]. However, there are concerns regarding appropriate rod contouring and placement as the screw heads are not visualized, particularly during long-construct posterior instrumentation [12]. If the screw heads are not properly aligned to facilitate the curvature of the rod, it may be arduous to position the rod. Moreover, it can be time consuming to remove the rod, adjust the screws, change the contour, and re-insert the rod [12]. This may require additional fluoroscopy images, leading to prolonged surgery and increased surgeon fatigue. Moreover, the rod cannot be forced in to engage with the screw heads as this will increase the risk of screw pull out [13-15].
To overcome these difficulties, we used the IDM facility of the navigation system to display all saved virtual images of screw placements to be projected every time a new screw is placed. This helps in planning the entry point, depth, and mediolateral alignment of each screw with respect to the other screws. The final merged projection of all saved virtual screw images allows the surgeon to tweak the screw position or contour the rod to facilitate hassle-free rod placement. However, these final adjustments are restricted to a minimum with the help of this IDM facility. This technique may not be limited to long-construct minimally-invasive posterior instrumentation, but can also be used during pelvic fixations, and spondylolisthesis to estimate the desired amount of correction required.
In conclusion, utilizing IDM facility of spinal navigation can help in overcoming difficulties in rod placement during minimally-invasive long-construct posterior instrumentation. This technique is vital for determining the appropriate alignment of each pedicle screw with respect to the other screws to achieve hassle-free rod placement, thereby reducing surgical time, radiation exposure, and surgeon fatigue.

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Fig. 1.
Navigation display monitor screenshot showing the placement of the right L2 pedicle screw, (A) sagittal cut at the level of right L2 pedicle, (B) axial cut at the level of L2 pedicles, (C) reference lateral view X-ray image, and (D) reference anteroposterior view X-ray image.
asj-2018-0233f1.jpg
Fig. 2.
Placement of right L3 pedicle screw with color coded projection of previously placed L2 screw, (A) sagittal cut at the level of right L3 pedicle, (B) axial cut at the level of L3 pedicles, (C) reference lateral view X-ray image, and (D) reference anteroposterior view X-ray image.
asj-2018-0233f2.jpg
Fig. 3.
Final navigation display monitor screenshot showing the merged projection of all placed pedicle screws in different colors, (A) sagittal cut image, (B) axial cut image, (C and D) reference lateral and anteroposterior view X-ray images.
asj-2018-0233f3.jpg
Fig. 4.
Sagittal cut merged projection image (Fig. 3A) used for determining the contour of the rod.
asj-2018-0233f4.jpg

References

1. Acar N, Karakasli A, Karaarslan AA, Ozcanhan MH, Ertem F, Erduran M. The mechanical effect of rod contouring on rod-screw system strength in spine fixation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2016 59:425–9.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Paik H, Kang DG, Lehman RA Jr, Gaume RE, Ambati DV, Dmitriev AE. The biomechanical consequences of rod reduction on pedicle screws: should it be avoided? Spine J 2013 13:1617–26.
crossref pmid
3. Slivka MA, Fan YK, Eck JC. The effect of contouring on fatigue strength of spinal rods: is it okay to rebend and which materials are best? Spine Deform 2013 1:395–400.
crossref pmid
4. Harris EB, Massey P, Lawrence J, Rihn J, Vaccaro A, Anderson DG. Percutaneous techniques for minimally invasive posterior lumbar fusion. Neurosurg Focus 2008 25:E12.
crossref
5. Kim TT, Johnson JP, Pashman R, Drazin D. Minimally invasive spinal surgery with intraoperative image-guided navigation. Biomed Res Int 2016 2016:5716235.
pmid pmc
6. Schlenzka D, Laine T, Lund T. Computer-assisted spine surgery. Eur Spine J 2000 9 Suppl 1:S57–64.
crossref pmid
7. Feng SW, Yang YJ, Li CZ, Lin MC, Chung TT, Chen YH. Accuracy of spinal screw fixation using intraoperative O-arm navigation: consecutive series of 118 screws. J Med Sci 2016 36:6–13.
crossref
8. Verma SK, Singh PK, Agrawal D, et al. O-arm with navigation versus C-arm: a review of screw placement over 3 years at a major trauma center. Br J Neurosurg 2016 30:658–61.
crossref pmid
9. Liu Z, Jin M, Qiu Y, Yan H, Han X, Zhu Z. The superiority of intraoperative O-arm navigation-assisted surgery in instrumenting extremely small thoracic pedicles of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016 95:e3581.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Wang H, Zhou Y, Liu J, Han J, Xiang L. Robot assisted navigated drilling for percutaneous pedicle screw placement: a preliminary animal study. Indian J Orthop 2015 49:452–7.
crossref pmid pmc
11. Overley SC, Cho SK, Mehta AI, Arnold PM. Navigation and robotics in spinal surgery: where are we now? Neurosurgery 2017 80:S86–99.
crossref pmid pdf
12. Mobbs RJ, Sivabalan P, Li J. Technique, challenges and indications for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation. J Clin Neurosci 2011 18:741–9.
crossref pmid
13. Newell R, Esfandiari H, Anglin C, Bernard R, Street J, Hodgson AJ. An intraoperative fluoroscopic method to accurately measure the post-implantation position of pedicle screws. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2018 13:1257–67.
crossref pmid pdf
14. Dunn C, Faloon M, Milman E, et al. Accuracy and safety of percutaneous lumbosacral pedicle screw placement using dual-planar intraoperative fluoroscopy. Asian Spine J 2018 12:238–45.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Kang DG, Lehman RA Jr, Wagner SC, et al. Effects of rod reduction on pedicle screw fixation strength in the setting of Ponte osteotomies. Spine J 2015 15:146–52.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 500 View
  • 31 Download
Related articles in ASJ


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea,
271 Cheonbo-ro, Uijeongbu 11765, Korea
Tel: +82-31-820-3578    Fax: +82-31-847-3671    E-mail: spinepjb@catholic.ac.kr                

Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Developed in M2community

Close layer
prev next