Asian Spine J Search

CLOSE


Asian Spine J > Volume 17(3); 2023 > Article
Kim, Park, Song, and Choi: Suction Drain Tip Cultures in Predicting a Surgical Site Infection

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective study.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of drain tip culture after spinal surgery with a large number of participants.

Overview of Literature

The routine culture of suction drain tips that are placed in the surgical site of spinal surgeries has been performed in many institutions to detect surgical site infection (SSI). However, few reports have evaluated drain tip culture as a prognostic for SSI after spinal surgery.

Materials and Methods

This study retrospectively included 1,415 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients diagnosed with infectious diseases were excluded. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered intraoperatively and 24 hours postoperatively. Drains were removed when the volume of postoperative fluid drainage was <50 mL and <100 mL in patients who underwent cervical and thoracic surgery and lumbar surgery in the preceding 24 hours, respectively, and cultures were made. We evaluated the correlation between the results of positive drain tip culture and SSI.

Results

Positive drain tip cultures were found in 51 cases (3.6%). SSI was identified in 34 cases (2.4%). The most frequently isolated microorganism was methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (61.8%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive, and negative predictive values of drain tip culture were 50.0%, 97.4%, 32.1%, and 98.8%, respectively. The same bacteria were isolated from the surgical lesion in 16 of 17 SSI cases with a positive drain tip culture, thereby giving a bacteria matching rate between tissue culture and drain tip culture of 94.1%. The number of surgery levels, drain remaining period, and drain tip culture positivity were significantly increased in the SSI group.

Conclusions

Drain tip cultures might be useful for predicting SSI. Drain tip culture had a high positivity rate in the SSI group, and the coincidence rate for the causative pathogen was high.

Introduction

Surgical drains, including closed suctions devices, are used in spinal surgeries in many institutions. Suction drainage can reduce hematoma formation, thereby minimizing the risk of postoperative neurological deficits from spinal neural tissue compression [1]. Additionally, drainage decreases the likelihood of prolonged discharge from the wound. Suction drainage can reduce infection rates, resulting in a more benign and uncomplicated postoperative course because wound hematoma is an ideal medium for bacterial colonization and postoperative surgical site infection (SSI) [2,3]. However, the use of closed suction drainage after spinal surgery remains controversial. Increasingly more randomized controlled studies indicate that closed suction drainage does not reduce the incidence of wound complications [47].
SSIs remain major surgical complications [8]. SSI after spinal surgery is a devastating complication that is often difficult to treat, with high associated morbidity, and mortality, thereby incurring a substantial cost to the healthcare system [9,10]. Drain tubes that are kept near the bone or implants may be the ideal “swabs” to promptly detect infection. Suction drainage at the spinal surgical site is an established principle of management for preventing infection, and wound drain culture has been used as an early detection method for SSI [11].
Numerous studies on the postoperative use of suction drainage have reported the results of suction drain tip culture after orthopedic surgery, but the relationship between a positive tip culture and SSI remains controversial [1216]. However, few reports have evaluated whether drain tip culture is prognostic for SSI after spinal surgery [1517].
This study retrospectively evaluated the prognostic value of drain tip culture after spinal surgery with a large number of participants.

Materials and Methods

This retrospective observational study included 1,415 consecutive patients (693 males, 722 females) who underwent spinal surgery at Gangneung Asan Hospital between January 2016 and December 2021. Patients with an infectious disease, such as discitis, were excluded. The mean age at surgery was 64.9 years, and 212 patients underwent cervical surgery, 1,099 underwent lumbosacral surgery, and 104 underwent thoracic surgery (Table 1).
All surgeries were performed under the same aseptic conditions using povidone-iodine for skin disinfection. Additionally, double gloving, and antimicrobial film were used. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered until 24 hours postoperatively. Patients received ceftezol at 1 g intravenously for 30 minutes before the skin incision, every 4 hours intraoperatively, and 12 hours postoperatively. A drain was placed below the deep fascia near the exposed dura before wound closure after surgery. The drain was removed when the amount of fluid that drained from the operative site was <50 mL and <100 mL in patients who underwent cervical and thoracic surgery and lumbar surgery, respectively. The surrounding skin was disinfected with 0.5% chlorhexidine gluconate solution before removal. The inner drain tip was cut approximately 2 cm from its far end with sterile scissors, and it was sent to the microbiological laboratory for cultural analysis.
SSIs were defined according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [18]. Any signs of infection, such as wound discharge, or dehiscence, fever, chills, or chronic pain, were recorded. Additionally, the culture outcome, and bacteria identification were recorded in all patients. Wounds were followed up for a minimum of 6 months. The study was approved by the institutional review board of Gangneung Asan Hospital (IRB GNAH, 2022-10-014). The requirement for informed consent from individual patients was omitted because of the retrospective design of this study.
Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS ver. 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Fisher’s exact test and the chi-square test were used for categorical variables. An independent t-test was used for normally distributed data and the Mann-Whitney U test for non-normally distributed data for continuous variables. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

SSIs were identified in 34 (2.4%) of 1,415 patients. Bacteria were isolated from the surgical site in 33 cases (97%). Bacteria were isolated by surgery in 23 cases, wound swap culture in six cases, and blood in four cases. Table 2 shows the characteristics of the bacterial isolates in the SSI group. The most frequently isolated bacteria were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis (MRSE) (61.8%). Of 34 SSIs, five and 29 were superficial and deep, respectively. There were 24 acute SSIs (within 3 weeks) and 10 chronic SSIs (range, 4–240 days; mean, 27 days). Acute and chronic SSI had no significant correlation with drain tip culture results (p=0.49).
Positive drain tip cultures were found in 133 cases (9.4%). The most frequently isolated microorganism was MRSE (28 cases, 21.1%). No additional therapy was performed in any cases with a positive drain culture with no other signs of SSI. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive, and negative predictive values of drain tip culture were 58.8%, 91.8%, 15.0%, and 98.9%, respectively (Table 3).
Positive drain tip cultures were found in 51 cases (3.6%) if a minimum of 20 growth colonies was considered significant to reduce the contamination effect [19]. The most frequently isolated microorganism was MRSE (28 cases, 54.9%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive, and negative predictive values of drain tip culture were 50.0%, 97.4%, 32.1%, and 98.8%, respectively (Table 4).
Table 5 shows the demographic characteristics of patients in the SSI group (SSI [+]) and non-SSI group (SSI [−]). Age, sex, surgical site, operative approach, pathology, and use of surgical instrumentation were not significantly different between the two groups. The number of surgery levels, drain removal period, and drain tip culture positivity were significantly increased in the SSI (+) group than in the SSI (−) group.
Table 6 shows the associations among the drain removal period, drain tip culture positivity, and occurrence of SSI. The frequency of positive drain cultures increased with a longer drain removal period (p=0.001). Additionally, the frequency of SSI increased with a longer drain removal period (p=0.01)
Table 7 shows the microorganisms that were cultured from the drain tips and their relationship with SSIs. Drain tip cultures (over 20 colonies) were positive in 16 cases in the SSI (+) group. The same bacteria were isolated from the surgical lesion in 16 of 17 SSI cases with a positive drain tip culture, thereby giving a bacteria matching rate between tissue culture and drain tip culture of 94.1%.

Discussion

Several studies have investigated the relationship between drain tip culture and the occurrence of SSI, especially in joint surgery [11,14,2023]. However, a few reports investigated the utility of drain tip culture in spinal surgery [1517,24]. Yamada et al. [15] reported that drain tip cultures had a sensitivity of 0% for detecting bacteria in 1,240 spine cases using a sterile method. Kawabata et al. [16] reported that drain tip cultures had a sensitivity of 29.8% for detecting bacteria in 4,573 spine cases using a nonsterile method. Our study revealed a relatively high sensitivity of 50.0%. Furthermore, the concordance rate between bacteria from the drain culture and those from the tissue culture was 94.1%. This finding indicates that the cultures from the drain can provide helpful information for SSI treatment after spinal surgery if an SSI is present and the drain tip culture is positive, such as selecting an appropriate antimicrobial agent. The difference between our results and other studies may depend on the procedure used to remove the drain. Yamada et al. [15] reported a positive drain tip culture rate of 4.4% when using a sterile method with povidone-iodine solution and Kawabata et al. [16] reported a positive drain tip culture rate of 8.4% when using a nonsterile method, whereas our study reported a rate of 3.6% using a sterile method with chlorhexidine gluconate. This may be because a skilled physician assistant sterilizes the wound with chlorhexidine not to contact the drain before removal in our study.
The correlation between the duration of drainage and drain culture results or onset of SSI is unclear. Previously, Sørensen and Sørensen [11] reported that early drain removal decreases the risk of retrograde migration of bacteria from the skin, and the frequency of positive drain tip cultures and the risk of infection are substantially increased if the drainage time is >6 days; thus, early removal of drains seems to be appropriate. A prolonged course of drain placement may result in a higher rate of bacterial contamination than a shorter duration [25,26]. Kobayashi [24] reported a positive rate for drains removed on day 5 at 33%, which was higher than that on earlier days. However, Ahn et al. [17] reported no significant correlation between wound infection and drainage duration. Our study revealed a significant association between drain tip culture positivity and drainage duration and between the rate of SSI and drainage duration. We suggest that long-term drain placement is undesirable in terms of wound infection.
Infections after spinal surgery are most commonly caused by Gram-positive organisms found on skin flora, most notably Staphylococcus aureus, and S. epidermidis [27]. S. epidermidis is the most prevalent bacterium among coagulase-negative staphylococci and is a common inhabitant of human skin and mucous membranes [28]. Recently, S. epidermidis has become a common cause of SSI after orthopedic implant surgery [2932]. A recent study reported 42.8% of MRSE-related SSIs [32]. Drain tip culture is useful for early SSI detection caused by methicillin-resistant bacteria [24]. Our study revealed MRSE as the most common SSI pathogen (61.8%) and the most common microorganism in drain tip culture (54.9%). A possible SSI should be considered in a case with MRSE in the drain tip culture, and close monitoring of the wound behavior and early intervention is necessary in such cases. In Korea, the cost of drain tip culture is approximately 23 US dollars (USD) and the patient’s copayment is approximately 6 USD. Performing a drain tip culture in all patients for early SSI diagnosis would be useful because of the low cost.
This study has some limitations. First, our study was retrospective in nature. However, we used the same method in all consecutive patients and did not use antibiotics according to the result of each culture, which may offset the drawback of the retrospective study design. Second, different types of surgery, and different types of approaches were included. Third, we only used a drain tip culture, and the drain fluid was not cultured. However, this study demonstrates the importance of drain tip culture through a large number of patients.

Conclusions

Drain tip cultures were not useful for predicting SSI because of low positive predictive value. Drain tip culture had a high positivity rate in the SSI group, and the coincidence rate for the causative pathogen was relatively high at 94.1%. The presence of SSI and the drain tip culture positivity can provide helpful information for SSI treatment after spinal surgery.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions

Study design: CK, JWP; data collection: MGS, HSC; data analysis: JWP; manuscript writing: CK, JWP; proof-reading: CK, JWP; and final approval of manuscript: all authors.

Table 1
Characteristics of the patients (N=1,415)
Characteristic Value
Age (yr) 64.9±12.6
Gender
 Male 693 (49.0)
 Female 722 (51.0)
Location of operation
 Cervical spine 212 (15.0)
 Thoracic spine 104 (7.3)
 Lumbosacral spine 1,099 (77.7)
Pathology
 Degeneration 1,213 (85.7)
 Trauma 158 (11.2)
 Neoplasm 44 (3.1)
Approach
 Anterior 115 (8.1)
 Posterior 1,287 (91.0)
 Anterior/posterior 13 (0.9)
Surgery level
 1 769 (54.3)
 2 407 (28.8)
 ≥3 239 (16.9)

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

Table 2
Types of bacteria isolated from the surgical site
Bacteria No. of cases of bacterial isolates at surgical sites
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis 21
Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus 5
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcia) 2
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 2
Enterococcus 2
Corynebacterium 1
Unkown 1
Total 34

a) Except Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Table 3
Relationship between SSI and drain tip culture
SSI (+) SSI (−) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Drain tip culture (+) 20 113 58.8 91.8 15.0 98.9
Drain tip culture (−) 14 1,268

SSI, surgical site infection; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

Table 4
Relationship between SSI and drain tip culture (a minimum of 20 growth colonies)
SSI (+) SSI (−) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%)
Drain tip culture (+) 17 34 50.0 97.4 32.1 98.8
Drain tip culture (−) 17 1,347

SSI, surgical site infection; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

Table 5
Demographic and operative characteristics of the SSI group and non-SSI group, and risk factors for SSI
Characteristic SSI (+) SSI (−) p-value
No. of cases 34 1,381
Age at surgery (yr) 61.3±17.0 64.9±12.5 0.2
Sex 0.16
 Male 21 672
 Female 13 709
Surgical site 0.84
 Cervical 6 206
 Thoracic 3 101
 Lumbar 25 1,074
Approach 0.18
 Anterior 0 115
 Anterior/posterior 0 13
 Posterior 34 1,253
Pathology 0.147
 Trauma 4 154
 Degeneration 27 1,186
 Neoplasm 3 41
Surgery levels 2.44±1.52 1.73±1.1 0.000
Instrumentation 28 (82.4) 1,004 (72.7) 0.21
Diabetes mellitus 7 (20.6) 343 (24.8) 0.69
Drain removal period (day) 4.29±1.6 3.44±1.1 0.004
Drain tip culture positive 20 (58.8) 113 (8.2) 0.000
Drain tip culture positive (over 20 colonies) 17 (50.0) 34 (2.5) 0.000

Values are presented as number, mean±standard deviation, or number (%).

SSI, surgical site infection.

Table 6
The association between drain removal period, positive drain tip culture, and SSI
Drain removal period No. of cases Positive tip culture Positive tip culture (over 20 colonies) SSIs
1 Day 14 0 0 0
2 Day 211 13 (6.2) 2 (0.9) 1 (0.5)
3 Day 526 39 (7.4) 14 (2.7) 9 (1.7)
4 Day 534 61 (11.4) 23 (4.3) 16 (3.0)
Over 5 day 130 20 (15.4) 12 (9.2) 8 (6.2)
Total 1,415 133 (9.4) 51 (3.6) 34 (2.4)

Values are presented as number or number (%).

SSI, surgical site infection.

Table 7
Bacterial isolates in drain tip and surgical site culture (a minimum of 20 growth colonies)
Bacteria No. of cases of bacterial isolates in drain tip culture SSI (−) SSI(+)
Concordance Discordance Total
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis 28 15 12 1 13
Coagulase-negative Staphylococcia) 5 5 0 0 0
Enterococcus 5 4 1 0 1
Enterobacteriaceae 4 4 0 0 0
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus 3 1 2 0 2
Corynebacterium 2 2 0 0 0
Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus 1 0 1 0 1
Acinetobacter 1 1 0 0 0
Streptococcus 1 1 0 0 0
Lactobacillus 1 1 0 0 0
Total 51 34 16 1 17

SSI, surgical site infection.

a) Except staphylococcus epidermidis.

References

1. Aono H, Ohwada T, Hosono N, et al. Incidence of postoperative symptomatic epidural hematoma in spinal decompression surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2011 15:202–5.
crossref pmid
2. Waugh TR, Stinchfield FE. Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1961 43-A:939–46.
crossref pmid
3. Mizuno K, Mikami Y, Hase H, et al. Innovative technique for the placement of the drainage tube for microendoscopic spinal decompression. Clin Spine Surg 2017 30:E59–63.
crossref pmid
4. Liu JM, Chen WZ, Fu BQ, Chen JW, Liu ZL, Huang SH. The use of closed suction drainage in lumbar spinal surgery: is it really necessary? World Neurosurg 2016 90:109–15.
crossref pmid
5. Zhang Q, Zhang Q, Guo W, Liu Z, Cheng L, Zhu G. No need for use of drainage after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized, controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015 135:709–13.
crossref pmid pdf
6. Kim YI, Fujita S, Hwang VJ, Nagase Y. Comparison of abdominal drainage and no-drainage after elective hepatectomy: a randomized study. Hepatogastroenterology 2014 61:707–11.
pmid
7. Fichman SG, Makinen TJ, Lozano B, et al. Closed suction drainage has no benefits in revision total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Int Orthop 2016 40:453–7.
crossref pmid pdf
8. Whitehouse JD, Friedman ND, Kirkland KB, Richardson WJ, Sexton DJ. The impact of surgical-site infections following orthopedic surgery at a community hospital and a university hospital: adverse quality of life, excess length of stay, and extra cost. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2002 23:183–9.
crossref pmid
9. Chahoud J, Kanafani Z, Kanj SS. Surgical site infections following spine surgery: eliminating the controversies in the diagnosis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2014 1:7.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Lambrechts MJ, Clair DD, Li J, et al. Is it cost effective to obtain fungal and acid-fast bacillus cultures during spine debridement? Asian Spine J 2022 16:519–25.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
11. Sorensen AI, Sorensen TS. Bacterial growth on suction drain tips: prospective study of 489 clean orthopedic operations. Acta Orthop Scand 1991 62:451–4.
crossref pmid
12. Bernard L, Pron B, Vuagnat A, et al. The value of suction drainage fluid culture during aseptic and septic orthopedic surgery: a prospective study of 901 patients. Clin Infect Dis 2002 34:46–9.
crossref pmid
13. Girvent R, Marti D, Muñoz JM. The clinical significance of suction drainage cultures. Acta Orthop Belg 1994 60:290–2.
pmid
14. Overgaard S, Thomsen NO, Kulinski B, Mossing NB. Closed suction drainage after hip arthroplasty. Prospective study of bacterial contamination in 81 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1993 64:417–20.
crossref pmid
15. Yamada T, Yoshii T, Egawa S, et al. Drain tip culture is not prognostic for surgical site infection in spinal surgery under prophylactic use of antibiotics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2016 41:1179–84.
crossref pmid
16. Kawabata A, Sakai K, Sato H, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal swab and suction drain tip cultures in 4573 spinal surgeries: efficacy in management of surgical site infections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018 43:E430–5.
pmid
17. Ahn JS, Lee HJ, Park E, Park IY, Lee JW. Suction drain tip culture after spine surgery: can it predict a surgical site infection? Asian Spine J 2015 9:863–8.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Horan TC, Gaynes RP, Martone WJ, Jarvis WR, Emori TG. CDC definitions of nosocomial surgical site infections, 1992: a modification of CDC definitions of surgical wound infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1992 13:606–8.
crossref pmid
19. Maki DG, Weise CE, Sarafin HW. A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med 1977 296:1305–9.
crossref pmid
20. Petsatodis G, Parziali M, Christodoulou AG, Hatzokos I, Chalidis BE. Prognostic value of suction drain tip culture in determining joint infection in primary and non-infected revision total hip arthroplasty: a prospective comparative study and review of the literature. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2009 129:1645–9.
crossref pmid pdf
21. Sankar B, Ray P, Rai J. Suction drain tip culture in orthopaedic surgery: a prospective study of 214 clean operations. Int Orthop 2004 28:311–4.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
22. Takada R, Jinno T, Koga D, Hirao M, Muneta T, Okawa A. Is drain tip culture prognostic of surgical site infection?: results of 1380 drain tip cultures in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2015 30:1407–9.
crossref pmid
23. Weinrauch P. Diagnostic value of routine drain tip culture in primary joint arthroplasty. ANZ J Surg 2005 75:887–8.
crossref pmid
24. Kobayashi K, Imagama S, Ito Z, et al. Is a drain tip culture required after spinal surgery? Clin Spine Surg 2017 30:356–9.
crossref pmid
25. Willemen D, Paul J, White SH, Crook DW. Closed suction drainage following knee arthroplasty: effectiveness and risks. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991 (264): 232–4.

26. Drinkwater CJ, Neil MJ. Optimal timing of wound drain removal following total joint arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995 10:185–9.
crossref pmid
27. Nagashima H, Yamane K, Nishi T, Nanjo Y, Teshima R. Recent trends in spinal infections: retrospective analysis of patients treated during the past 50 years. Int Orthop 2010 34:395–9.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
28. Otto M. Staphylococcus epidermidis: the ‘accidental’ pathogen. Nat Rev Microbiol 2009 7:555–67.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
29. Mok JM, Guillaume TJ, Talu U, et al. Clinical outcome of deep wound infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion: a matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 34:578–83.
pmid
30. Zimmerli W, Trampuz A, Ochsner PE. Prosthetic-joint infections. N Engl J Med 2004 351:1645–54.
crossref pmid
31. Ho C, Skaggs DL, Weiss JM, Tolo VT. Management of infection after instrumented posterior spine fusion in pediatric scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 32:2739–44.
crossref pmid
32. Takizawa T, Tsutsumimoto T, Yui M, Misawa H. Surgical site infections caused by Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis after spinal instrumentation surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017 42:525–30.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3010-3530    Fax: +82-2-3010-8555    E-mail: asianspinejournal@gmail.com                
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
27, Dongguk-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang-si 10326, Korea
Tel: +82-31-966-3413    Fax: +82-2-831-3414    E-mail: office@spine.or.kr                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next