Asian Spine J Search

CLOSE


Asian Spine J > Online first
Fujita, Singh, Björklund, Gerdhem, and MacDowall: Spinal ankylosis and sex-specific predisposing factors in type II odontoid fractures: a comparison with sub-axial fractures

Abstract

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Purpose

We assessed the predisposition to type II odontoid fractures (T2OFs) in elderly people by comparing patients who had T2OFs with those who had sub-axial fractures.

Overview of Literature

T2OFs are common among elderly people; osteoporosis and degenerative changes in the upper cervical spine are major risk factors. However, the role of spinal ankylosis remains unclear.

Methods

We analyzed data from 45 patients with T2OFs and 79 with sub-axial fractures, all aged ≥75 years. Hounsfield unit (HU) values at C2–C4, the prevalence of ankylosis, and degenerative changes were assessed via computed tomography. We performed sex-specific analysis and logistic regression to identify factors associated with T2OF. In addition, we used the Swedish Fracture Registry (SFR) to analyze the prevalence of spinal ankylosis among Swedish patients with T2OFs and sub-axial fractures.

Results

Among patients with T2OFs, in comparison with those with sub-axial fractures, spinal ankylosis was less prevalent (2.2% vs. 31.6%, p<0.001), HU values were lower (p<0.05), atlanto-occipital degeneration was less prevalent (p=0.009), and facet joint degeneration was more prevalent (p=0.03). Logistic regression revealed that atlanto-occipital degeneration (odds ratio, 0.33; p=0.02) and spinal ankylosis (odds ratio, 0.06; p=0.01) were negative predictors of T2OF. Sex-specific analysis revealed that HU values were lower for women with T2OFs (p<0.05) and ankylosis was less prevalent among men with T2OFs (p<0.001) than among sex-matched patients with sub-axial fractures. The SFR confirmed that ankylosis was less prevalent among patients with T2OFs (3.3%) than among those with sub-axial fractures (28.3%, p<0.0001).

Conclusions

Spinal ankylosis and atlanto-occipital degeneration are significant risk factors for T2OF. According to sex-specific analysis, spinal ankylosis was less prevalent among men with T2OFs than among those with sub-axial fractures, whereas C2–C4 HU values were significantly lower in among women with T2OFs.

Introduction

Odontoid fractures, particularly Anderson–D’Alonzo type II fractures [1], are the most common upper cervical spine injuries in adults aged 70 years and older [2]. These fractures are associated with relatively high mortality rates among patients who undergo operative treatment (3.6%) and those who receive nonoperative treatment (5.9%) [3]. Because the elevated rates of mortality and morbidity remain a pressing challenge in contemporary healthcare, the predisposing factors should be identified [4]. As the aging population increases, the incidence of odontoid fractures is expected to increase; thus, effective treatment strategies and targeted preventive measures are urgently needed.
In older adults, age-related bone degeneration increases stiffness and reduces mobility in the middle and lower cervical spine; motion is therefore shifted to the upper cervical spine, which increases the incidence of injuries in that region [5]. In younger patients, cervical fractures often result from high-energy trauma, whereas in older adults, these fractures are caused primarily by low-energy trauma mechanisms, such as falls from a standing or seated position [6]. These characteristics of cervical spine fractures in elderly people prompt the question of which structural or age-related bone and joint alterations actually increase vulnerability to type II odontoid fractures (T2OFs). Results of previous studies suggest that differing levels of osteoarthritic degeneration in the atlanto-odontoid joint and the lateral atlanto-axial joints may predispose older adults to T2OF [7]. According to research in western Europe, however, these degenerative changes are probably secondary to bone loss and aging, rather than serving as independent predisposing factors [8]. This divergence in findings indicates that a consensus about causes has not yet been reached.
Prior studies of T2OF risk factors have not addressed the potential role of ankylosing spinal disorders, such as diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and ankylosing spondylitis. DISH is a noninflammatory condition in which the spinal longitudinal ligaments and entheses gradually ossify, reducing mobility in the affected section [9]. According to a report from Japan, the prevalence of DISH is 26% in the general population, increasing to 48% among patients aged 70 years and older. Although results of some studies suggest no regional differences in DISH prevalence [10], analyses of whole-spine computed tomographic (CT) scans have revealed slight regional variations; the prevalence ranges from 13.2% to 19.5% [11,12]. DISH is associated with older age, obesity, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and male sex [10], and it adversely affects bone mineral density and bone quality [13,14]. Furthermore, DISH is associated with a predisposition to spinal fractures even with low-energy trauma in elderly people [15]. DISH not only may cause an imbalance in mechanical stress on the cervical spine but also may directly affect bone strength; thus, it may be among the risk factors for T2OF.
Our aim was to assess the predisposition to T2OF in elderly patients through a comparative analysis of those with T2OFs and those with sub-axial fractures. We focused on identifying risk factors for T2OF, including bone quality, degenerative changes in adjacent upper cervical joints, and the potential role of spinal ankylosis.

Materials and Methods

Study overview

This retrospective cohort study was approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (2011/068) and the Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2020-00993). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants in the Uppsala Study on Odontoid Fracture Treatment (USOFT) study but was omitted from the Swespine cohort due to the retrospective design.

Study population

We used anonymized patient data, primarily from the USOFT trial [16]. These data were from patients aged ≥75 years with acute displaced T2OFs who met the inclusion criteria of our study between April 2011 and March 2023. Inclusion criteria were fracture diagnoses based on multiplanar cervical CT scans, wherein displacement was defined as ≥5 mm anterior translation, any posterior translation, or ≥10° angulation. Exclusion criteria included American Society of Anesthesiologists class ≥4, severe dementia that necessitated institutional care, occipitocervical anomalies, and spinal cord injury or severe dislocation that necessitated surgery. This study also included data from patients who met the inclusion criteria after USOFT enrollment ended (April–December 2024). The control group consisted of patients aged ≥75 years participating in the ongoing Triage, Position, and Documentation (TriPoD) study (Swedish Ethical Review Authority: 2020-00993), which focuses on sub-axial fractures. These patients, whose fractures were diagnosed between January 2015 and May 2021, were listed in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR); we retrieved their CT scans from primary healthcare centers. Age, sex, and baseline data were documented in both cohorts.

Image analysis

Cervical multidetector CT imaging was performed with four different scanners: Siemens Somatom Definition Flash (Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) and Canon Aquilion Prime, Canon Aquilion ONE, and Canon Aquilion Prime SP (Canon Medical Systems, Tochigi, Japan). CT imaging was performed in helical acquisition mode with 120 kVp, adaptive tube load, and a slice thickness of 0.6–0.7 mm. Multiplanar reformations were created in three orientations (slice thickness: 1.0–3.0 mm). All standard cervical spine images were loaded into the institutional picture archiving and communication systems.
We assessed bone quality by measuring Hounsfield unit (HU) values at the C2, C3, and C4 vertebrae. HU values obtained through CT represent a bone quality assessment method and are correlated with bone mineral density as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [17]. Studies have demonstrated correlations between cervical spine HU values at C2 and C3 and lumbar bone mineral density [18]. In accordance with previous methods, an experienced orthopedic surgeon manually marked circular (≥35 mm2) regions of interest (ROIs) in the midtrabecular region of the C2–C4 vertebral bodies on the sagittal scans (Fig. 1). Sagittal reformation ensured equidistant placement in relation to the endplates but excluded the fracture gap and the vascular posterior region. One case of T2OF and one of sub-axial fracture were unsuitable for HU measurement at C4 because of chronic vertebral fracture or unavoidable inclusion of the fracture line in the ROI.
An experienced orthopedic surgeon performed all measurements twice, 3 weeks apart; odontoid cysts and degeneration severity in the atlanto-occipital, lateral atlanto-axial, facet, and atlanto-odontoid joints were assessed according to a consensus-based modified grading system (Supplements 15) [8]. We also examined the prevalence of disproportionate degeneration of the atlanto-odontoid and lateral atlanto-axial joints, defined as grade differences of ≥2, as reported in previous studies [7]. In addition, we assessed spinal ankylosis according to DISH criteria, identifying cases with continuous ossification of four or more vertebrae [9]. To minimize selection bias, we did not distinguish disproportionate degeneration in cases of DISH from that in cases of ankylosing spondylitis.

The prevalence of ankylosing spinal disorders among patients with cervical fractures in Sweden

To evaluate whether the prevalence of spinal ankylosis in both cohorts in this study was representative of patients across Sweden with cervical fracture, we compared the prevalence of spinal ankylosis between patients aged ≥75 years with T2OFs and those with sub-axial fractures who were listed in the SFR. The SFR is a nationwide quality registry that collects data on all types of orthopedic fractures, regardless of treatment [19]. Spine fractures have been included in the SFR since 2015 [20]. In the SFR, the physician who registers a patient has assessed for signs of ankylosing spinal disorders in the fracture area. In a previous report, the mean kappa coefficient for intrarater reliability was relatively high, ranging between 0.79 and 0.81 for the presence or absence of signs of ankylosing disorder in the fracture area [21].

Statistical analysis

To perform statistical analyses, we used GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA), wherein p-values of <0.05 were considered significant. The results were calculated as medians (with interquartile ranges) for nonparametric variables (nonnormally distributed data). We used the Mann-Whitney U test to evaluate differences in continuous variables between groups and Fisher’s exact test to compare proportions. To identify predisposing factors for T2OF, we subjected data from patients with T2OFs and sub-axial fractures together to multivariable logistic regression analysis. From among variable combinations found to be significant (p<0.05) or trending toward significance (p<0.2) in the univariate analyses, we selected those that minimized the Akaike information criterion. To perform sex-stratified comparisons between patients with T2OFs and those with sub-axial fractures, we used the Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test.

Results

Fig. 2 is the flowchart of patient selection. This study included 45 patients with T2OFs and 79 with sub-axial fractures aged 75 years or older. Table 1 lists patient characteristics, bone quality, and cervical spine degeneration. HU values at C2, C3, and C4 were significantly lower in among patients with T2OFs than in those with sub-axial fractures (ps=0.003, 0.04, and 0.049, respectively). Among patients with T2OFs, degeneration of the atlanto-occipital joint was significantly less severe (mean grade: 0.97) than among patients with sub-axial fractures (mean grade: 1.26; p=0.009), whereas facet joint degeneration was significantly more severe (p=0.03). Spinal ankylosis was more prevalent among patients with sub-axial fractures (n=27 [31.7%]) than among those with T2OFs (n=1 [2.2%], p<0.001). Table 2 lists multivariable logistic regression results that reveal risk factors for T2OF. Significant factors included atlanto-occipital degeneration (odds ratio [OR], 0.335; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.118–0.781; p=0.02) and spinal ankylosis (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.003–0.36; p=0.01). The proportion of cases with a degeneration grade difference of ≥2 between the atlanto-odontoid and lateral atlanto-axial joints was similar in both groups: three patients (6.6%) with T2OFs and 5 (6.3%) with sub-axial fractures (p>0.99).

Sex-stratified comparisons between type II odontoid fractures and sub-axial fractures

We compared baseline data, HU values, spinal ankylosis prevalence, and degenerative changes between the two cohorts according to sex. Among the 52 men with sub-axial fractures and the 22 men with T2OFs, spinal ankylosis was significantly more common among the former (44.2% vs. 4.5%, respectively; p<0.001); we found no significant differences for other variables (Table 3). Among the 23 women with T2OFs and the 27 women with sub-axial fractures, HU values at C2, C3, and C4 were significantly lower among those with T2OFs (ps=0.009, 0.007, and 0.01, respectively). Atlanto-occipital joint degeneration was also significantly less severe among the women with T2OFs (mean grade: 0.9) than among those with sub-axial fractures (mean grade: 1.2; p=0.02) (Table 4).

The incidence of spinal ankylosis among cervical fractures in Sweden

We compared data for 355 patients with T2OFs and 558 with sub-axial fractures, all aged ≥75 years, who were listed in the SFR. Spinal ankylosis was significantly more prevalent among those with sub-axial fractures (n=158 [28.3%]) than among those with T2OFs (n=12 [123.3%], p<0.0001) (Table 5). These findings suggest that the prevalence of spinal ankylosis in our cohorts reflects that in the national population.

Sub-analysis: comparison of type II odontoid fractures and sub-axial fractures, ankylosis excluded

We compared data from the 44 patients with T2OFs and the 54 with sub-axial fractures who did not have spinal ankylosis. Table 6 lists patient characteristics, bone quality, and cervical spine degeneration. We found no difference in atlanto-odontoid joint degeneration (p=0.54), but lateral atlanto-axial joint degeneration was more prevalent among the patients with sub-axial fractures (p=0.001). Atlanto-occipital degeneration was less severe in patients with T2OFs (mean grade: 0.95) than in those with sub-axial fractures (mean grade: 1.22; p=0.01), whereas cervical facet degeneration was more severe in the former (p=0.03). Grades differed by ≥2 in three patients with T2OFs (7%) and in five with sub-axial fractures (10%); the difference was not significant (p=0.72).

Sub-analysis: comparison of cervical spine fractures in elderly patients with and without DISH

Of all the patients in this study, 26 had DISH and 98 did not. Of those with DISH, 24 (92.3%) were men, in comparison with 50 (51.0%) of the men who did not have DISH; the difference was statistically significant (p<0.0001). The HU value at C2 was significantly higher in patients with DISH than in those without (p<0.001). Patients with DISH also had more severe degeneration of the atlanto-occipital joint (p=0.01) and cervical facet joints (p=0.009). In addition, odontoid cysts were significantly less pronounced in patients with DISH than in those without (p=0.02) (Supplement 6).

Discussion

Our study revealed that spinal ankylosis was significantly less prevalent among elderly patients with T2OFs than among those with sub-axial fractures. Moreover, multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that spinal ankylosis was associated with a lower risk of odontoid fracture. Sub-axial fractures are frequently associated with spinal ankylosis, especially in patients with DISH, and are characterized by low-energy traumatic causes, a high complication rate, poor neurological outcomes, and a 3-month mortality rate of up to 20% [22], whereas odontoid fractures have been documented in only a limited number of patients with spinal ankylosis [23].
DISH is a systemic metabolic disorder marked by the development of new bone formations and enthesopathies that affect both the axial and peripheral skeleton. Although the pathogenesis of DISH has not yet been fully elucidated, Okada et al. [24] reported that metabolic syndrome was significantly associated with DISH. Metabolic syndrome was recently reported to be associated with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) as well as with DISH [25], and OPLL was shown to be associated with an increase in systemic bone mineral density [26]. In some cases of DISH in the cervical or thoracic spine, bone density is increased in the lumbar spine (L1–L4) [13]; however, significant reductions of HU values have been reported in the middle of autofused long segments, which is consistent with stress shielding [14]. In cervical DISH, the middle to lower cervical vertebrae are often fused [11], whereas C2 is positioned in a region less affected by stress shielding from long segment autofusion. In addition, cervical spinal fractures associated with DISH tend to occur at the level of the intervertebral disc rather than that of the vertebral body, whereas the opposite is true of DISH-related fractures of the thoracic spine [27]. This observation further suggests that T2OFs may be less likely to occur in patients with DISH than in those without.
In this study, of the patients with cervical fractures, those with spinal ankylosis exhibited significantly higher HU values at C2 than did those without spinal ankylosis. Investigators have examined cervical HU values in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (mean age: 49 years), reporting values higher than those in our study: 354 at C3 and 350 at C4 [28]. In addition, Han et al. [18] found that the average HU value at C3 was 231.5±52 in individuals with osteoporosis and 284.0±63.3 in those with osteopenia. Therefore, in both the patients with T2OFs and those with sub-axial fractures in our study, bone quality was probably impaired. Our logistic regression analysis revealed an association between lower HU values at C2 and the occurrence of T2OF. Furthermore, of the female patients, those with T2OFs had significantly lower HU values at C2–C4 than did those with sub-axial fractures. At this time, our findings are primarily of academic significance and do not reveal strategies for preventing T2OF. However, they suggest that osteoporosis may play a role in T2OF development, particularly in women, and that improving bone quality through osteoporosis treatment could help reduce its incidence. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment in lowering T2OF risk.
We also found that degeneration of the atlanto-occipital joint was significantly associated with a reduced incidence of T2OF. Although this finding contradicts those of previous reports [8], one possible reason may lie in the choice of control group in our study, which comprised patients with sub-axial fractures. The atlanto-occipital joint contributes to approximately 50% of cervical flexion [29]; therefore, increased degeneration may lead to limited flexion–extension mobility of the entire cervical spine. As a result, sub-axial fractures may have occurred more frequently than T2OFs, which are typically associated with rotational mechanisms.
Investigation of the predisposing factors for odontoid fractures in elderly people is made more complex by the difficulty in establishing an appropriate control group. Because the control group must consist of patients with cervical spine trauma, previous researchers have enrolled controls such as patients with C2 fractures other than T2OFs [7], those with sub-axial fractures [8], or a combination of patients without fractures and those with non-odontoid cervical fractures [30]. Because the control groups differ among studies, direct comparisons are challenging. In addition, our sex-specific analysis revealed notable patterns. The prevalence of spinal ankylosis was significantly lower among men with T2OFs than among men with sub-axial fractures. Conversely, HU values at C2, C3, and C4 were significantly lower in women with T2OFs than in women with sub-axial fractures, although the prevalence of spinal ankylosis did not differ between those two groups. Investigators in previous studies have reached no clear consensus about which sex is more susceptible to T2OF. Spinal ankylosis is more prevalent in men, whereas osteoporosis is more common in women; because both conditions tend to progress with age, sex-specific analyses may provide valuable insights, particularly in elderly populations.
This study had several limitations. First, as a retrospective study, it was prone to selection bias. Second, because the sample size was small, the generalizability of the findings is limited. In addition, patients with T2OFs had low-energy trauma injuries without spinal cord injury, whereas those with sub-axial fractures included patients with spinal cord injuries. Further research with larger, sex-stratified cohorts and comparable trauma severity is needed. Third, we studied ankylosing spinal disorders collectively without distinguishing patients with DISH from those with ankylosing spondylitis, despite the differing inflammatory mechanisms of these diseases [31]. In future studies, researchers should examine these conditions separately. Last, although the prevalence of spinal ankylosis in our study population was similar to that in the national registry, the prevalence of DISH was high in our study. Because DISH incidence varies by region, genetics, and nutrition [32], our findings may not be generalizable to other populations; thus, further research is warranted.

Conclusions

In this study, multivariate regression logistic analysis revealed spinal ankylosis and degenerative changes of atlanto-occipital joints as statistically significant predisposing factors for T2OF. Moreover, sex-specific analysis revealed distinct trends: spinal ankylosis was significantly less prevalent among men with T2OFs than among men with sub-axial fractures, whereas C2–C4 HU values were significantly lower in women with T2OFs than in women with sub-axial fractures.

Key Points

  • Spinal ankylosis was significantly less prevalent among elderly patients with type II odontoid fractures (T2OFs) than among those with sub-axial fractures.

  • Multivariate regression logistic analysis identified spinal ankylosis and degenerative changes of atlanto-occipital joints as statistically significant predisposing factors for T2OF.

  • Sex-specific analysis revealed that spinal ankylosis was significantly less common among men with T2OFs and C2–C4 Hounsfield unit values were significantly lower in women with T2OFs; thus, fracture risk factors may differ according to sex.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: RF, PG, AM. Methodology: RF, AM. Data curation: RF, AS, MB. Formal analysis: RF. Investigation: RF. Resources: RF. Project administration: RF. Writing–original drafts: RF. Writing–review & editing: AS, PG, AM. Supervision: PG, AM. Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be available from https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0089.
Supplement 1. Severity grading of degenerative changes in the atlanto-odontoid joints.
Supplement 2. Severity grading of degenerative changes in the atlanto-occipital, lateral atlanto-axial, and facet joints.
Supplement 3. Severity grading of erosions and cysts near the atlanto-odontoid joint.
asj-2025-0089-Supplementary-1,2,3.pdf
Supplement 4. Grading of degenerative changes in the atlanto-odontoid, atlanto-axial, and facet joints.
Supplement 5. Grading of dens cysts.
asj-2025-0089-Supplementary-4,5.pdf
Supplement 6. Comparison of baseline data between patients with and without DISH.
asj-2025-0089-Supplementary-6.pdf

Fig. 1
Measurement of attenuation values. Attenuation values were measured on sagittal computed tomography images of the upper cervical spine. Regions of interests (white circles) were placed, excluding the fracture gap and the posterior vertebral body.
asj-2025-0089f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Study flow chart. USOFT, Uppsala Study on Odontoid Fracture Treatment; SFR, Swedish Fracture Registry; CT, computed tomography.
asj-2025-0089f2.jpg
Table 1
Patients baseline characteristics and severity of bone loss and degenerative changes
Characteristic Type II odontoid fracture patients (N=45) Sub-axial fracture patients (N=79) p-value
Age (yr) 84 (81–88) 84 (78–88) 0.41
Male 22 (48.8) 52 (65.8) 0.08
Hounsfield unit
 C2 198 (144.8–265.3) 248 (194.0–300) 0.003
 C3 223 (157.5–283) 254 (204.0–309) 0.04
 C4 238 (171.8–313.8) [1] 276.5 (218.8–343.8) [1] 0.049
Degenerative change
 Atlanto-odontoid joint 2 (2–3) 2 (1–3) 0.84
 Lateral atlanto-axial joint 2 (1–2) 2 (1–2) 0.27
 Atlanto-occipital joint 1 (1–1) 0.97±0.54 1 (1–1) 1.26±0.54 0.009
 Cervical facet joint 3 (2–3) 2 (2–3) 0.03
Odontoid cyst 1 (1–1) 1 (1–2) 0.89
Existence of spinal ankylosis 1 (2.2) 25 (31.7) <0.001

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or median (interquartile range) mean±standard deviation for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical variables. The brackets [x] in the right column present the number of missing values.

Table 2
Multivariable logistic regression analysis to identify possible patient background factors that potentially are risk factors for the type II odontoid fracture
Variable Odds ratio (95% CI) p-value
C2 HU value 0.99 (0.98–0.99) 0.054
Degenerative change of atlanto-occipital joint 0.33 (0.11–0.78) 0.02
Prevalence of spinal ankylosis 0.06 (0.003–0.36) 0.01

HU, Hounsfield unit; CI, confidence interval.

Table 3
Patients’ characteristics and severity of bone loss and degenerative changes in males
Characteristic Type II odontoid fracture patients (N=22) Sub-axial fracture patients (N=52) p-value
Age (yr) 84 (79–86) 83.0 (79–88) 0.83
Hounsfield unit
 C2 243.5 (193.8–292) 251.5 (211.3–336.5) 0.40
 C3 251 (216.5–318.5) 263.3 (215.3–313.5) 0.99
 C4 284 (200.5–360.5) [1] 290 (219.5–347.5) 0.90
Degenerative change
 Atlanto-odontoid joint 2 (2–2) 2 (1–3) 0.74
 Lateral atlanto-axial joint 2 (1–2) 2 (1–2) 0.26
 Atlanto-occipital joint 1 (1–1) 1 (1–1) 0.31
 Cervical facet joint 3 (2–3) 3 (2–3) 0.14
Odontoid cyst 1 (1–1) 1 (1–2) 0.46
Existence of spinal ankylosis 1 (4.5) 23 (44.2) <0.001

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical variables. The brackets [x] in the right column present the number of missing values.

Table 4
Patients’ characteristics and severity of bone loss and degenerative changes in females
Characteristic Type II odontoid fracture patients (N=23) Sub-axial fracture patients (N=27) p-value
Age (yr) 87 (83–90) 85 (78–88) 0.23
Hounsfield unit
 C2 182 (118–205) 219 (178–286) 0.009
 C3 185 (137–239) 249 (196–288) 0.007
 C4 202 (145–253) 271.5 (210.3–332.5) [1] 0.01
Degenerative change
 Atlanto-odontoid joint 2 (1–3) 2 (1–2) 0.44
 Lateral atlanto-axial joint 2 (1–2) 2 (2–2) 0.49
 Atlanto-occipital joint 1 (1–1) 0.86±0.54 1 (1–1) 1.22±0.42 0.02
 Cervical facet joint 2 (2–3) 2 (2–3) 0.39
Odontoid cyst 1 (1–1) 1 (1–2) 0.30
Existence of spinal ankylosis 0 (0) 2 (7.41) 0.49

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or median (interquartile range) mean±standard deviation for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical variables. The brackets [x] in the right column present the number of missing values.

Table 5
Baseline data of patients with cervical spine fractures and the prevalence of ankylosing spine from the Swedish fracture registry
Variable Type II odontoid fracture patients (N=355) Sub-axial fracture patients (N=558) p-value
Age (yr) 84.0 (79–89) 83.0 (78–88) 0.03
Male 176 (49.5) 325 (58.2) 0.01
Existence of spinal ankylosis 12 (3.3) 158 (28.3) <0.0001

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical variables.

Table 6
Patients’ characteristics and severity of bone loss and degenerative changes (without spinal ankylosis)
Variable Type II odontoid fracture patients (N=44) Sub-axial fracture patients (N=54) p-value
Age (yr) 84 (81–88) 83 (78–87) 0.19
Male 21 (47.7) 29 (53.7) 0.68
Hounsfield unit
 C2 197 (144.8–265.3) 223.5 (184.5–275.3) 0.06
 C3 225 (157.3–284.5) 248.5 (202.8–296.8) 0.07
 C4 240 (177–319) [1] 276 (214.5–336) [1] 0.12
Degenerative change
 Atlanto-odontoid joint 2 (2–2) 2 (1–2) 0.54
 Lateral atlanto-axial joint 1 (1–2) 2 (1–2) 0.001
 Atlanto-occipital joint 1 (1–1) 0.95±0.48 1 (1–1) 1.22±0.53 0.01
 Cervical facet joint 3 (2–3) 2 (2–3) 0.03
Odontoid cyst 1 (1–1) 1 (1–2) 0.29

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or median (interquartile range) mean±standard deviation for continuous variables and as number (%) for categorical variables. The brackets [x] in the right column present the number of missing values.

References

1. Anderson LD, D’Alonzo RT. Fractures of the odontoid process of the axis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1974;56:1663–74.
crossref pmid
2. Nagashima H, Morio Y, Hasegawa K, Teshima R. Odontoid fractures complicated by fractures of the posterior arch of the atlas in the elderly over 85 years with severe thoracic kyphosis secondary to osteoporosis. Injury 2001;32:501–4.
crossref pmid
3. Alluri R, Bouz G, Solaru S, Kang H, Wang J, Hah RJ. A nationwide analysis of geriatric odontoid fracture incidence, complications, mortality, and cost. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021;46:131–7.
crossref pmid
4. Ryang YM, Torok E, Janssen I, et al. Early morbidity and mortality in 50 very elderly patients after posterior atlantoaxial fusion for traumatic odontoid fractures. World Neurosurg 2016;87:381–91.
crossref pmid
5. Olerud C, Andersson S, Svensson B, Bring J. Cervical spine fractures in the elderly: factors influencing survival in 65 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 1999;70:509–13.
crossref pmid
6. Baranto D, Steinke J, Blixt S, et al. The epidemiology of odontoid fractures: a study from the Swedish fracture register. Eur Spine J 2024;33:3034–42.
crossref pmid pdf
7. Watanabe M, Sakai D, Yamamoto Y, Nagai T, Sato M, Mochida J. Analysis of predisposing factors in elderly people with type II odontoid fracture. Spine J 2014;14:861–6.
crossref pmid
8. Kaesmacher J, Schweizer C, Valentinitsch A, et al. Osteoporosis is the most important risk factor for odontoid fractures in the elderly. J Bone Miner Res 2017;32:1582–8.
crossref pmid pdf
9. Resnick D, Niwayama G. Radiographic and pathologic features of spinal involvement in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH). Radiology 1976;119:559–68.
crossref pmid
10. Hirasawa A, Robinson Y, Olerud C, et al. Regional differences in diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a retrospective cohort study from Sweden and Japan. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2018;43:E1474–8.
pmid
11. Hiyama A, Katoh H, Sakai D, Sato M, Tanaka M, Watanabe M. Prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) assessed with whole-spine computed tomography in 1479 subjects. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018;19:178.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
12. Fournier DE, Leung AE, Battie MC, Seguin CA. Prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) and early-phase DISH across the lifespan of an American population. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2024;63:1153–61.
crossref pmid pdf
13. Sohn S, Chung CK, Han I, Park SB, Kim H. Increased bone mineral density in cervical or thoracic diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH): a case-control study. J Clin Densitom 2018;21:68–74.
crossref pmid
14. Swart A, Hamouda A, Pennington Z, et al. Significant reduction in bone density as measured by Hounsfield units in patients with ankylosing spondylitis or diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. J Clin Med 2024;13:1430.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Shimizu T, Suda K, Harmon SM, et al. The impact of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis on nutritional status, neurological outcome, and perioperative complications in patients with cervical spinal cord injury. J Clin Med 2023;12:5714.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Robinson AL, Schmeiser G, Robinson Y, Olerud C. Surgical vs. non-surgical management of displaced type-2 odontoid fractures in patients aged 75 years and older: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2018;19:452.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
17. Schreiber JJ, Anderson PA, Rosas HG, Buchholz AL, Au AG. Hounsfield units for assessing bone mineral density and strength: a tool for osteoporosis management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011;93:1057–63.
crossref pmid
18. Han K, You ST, Lee HJ, Kim IS, Hong JT, Sung JH. Hounsfield unit measurement method and related factors that most appropriately reflect bone mineral density on cervical spine computed tomography. Skeletal Radiol 2022;51:1987–93.
crossref pmid pdf
19. Moller M, Wolf O, Bergdahl C, et al. The Swedish Fracture Register: ten years of experience and 600,000 fractures collected in a National Quality Register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2022;23:141.
pmid pmc
20. Wennergren D, Ekholm C, Sandelin A, Moller M. The Swedish fracture register: 103,000 fractures registered. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16:338.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
21. Morgonskold D, Warkander V, Savvides P, et al. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of vertebral fracture classifications in the Swedish fracture register. World J Orthop 2019;10:14–22.
crossref pmid pmc
22. Westerveld LA, Verlaan JJ, Oner FC. Spinal fractures in patients with ankylosing spinal disorders: a systematic review of the literature on treatment, neurological status and complications. Eur Spine J 2009;18:145–56.
crossref pmid pdf
23. Tsuji S, Inoue S, Tachibana T, Maruo K, Arizumi F, Yoshiya S. Post-traumatic torticollis due to odontoid fracture in a patient with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e1478.
pmid pmc
24. Okada E, Ishihara S, Azuma K, et al. Metabolic syndrome is a predisposing factor for diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis. Neurospine 2021;18:109–16.
crossref pmid pdf
25. Koike Y, Takahata M, Nakajima M, et al. Genetic insights into ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the spine. Elife 2023;12:e86514.
pmid pmc
26. Fujita R, Endo T, Takahata M, et al. High whole-body bone mineral density in ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J 2023;23:1461–70.
crossref pmid
27. Katoh H, Okada E, Yoshii T, et al. A comparison of cervical and thoracolumbar fractures associated with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a nationwide multicenter study. J Clin Med 2020;9:208.
crossref pmid pmc
28. Marques ML, Pereira da Silva N, van der Heijde D, et al. Low-dose CT Hounsfield units: a reliable methodology for assessing vertebral bone density in radiographic axial spondyloarthritis. RMD Open 2022;8:e002149.
crossref pmid pmc
29. Hall GC, Kinsman MJ, Nazar RG, et al. Atlanto-occipital dislocation. World J Orthop 2015;6:236–43.
crossref pmid pmc
30. Shinseki MS, Zusman NL, Hiratzka J, Marshall LM, Yoo JU. Association between advanced degenerative changes of the atlanto-dens joint and presence of dens fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2014;96:712–7.
crossref pmid
31. Schwendner M, Seule M, Meyer B, Krieg SM. Management of spine fractures in ankylosing spondylitis and diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis: a challenge. Neurosurg Focus 2021;51:E2.
crossref
32. Weinfeld RM, Olson PN, Maki DD, Griffiths HJ. The prevalence of diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis (DISH) in two large American Midwest metropolitan hospital populations. Skeletal Radiol 1997;26:222–5.
crossref pmid pdf
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 873 View
  • 18 Download
Related articles in ASJ


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3010-3530    Fax: +82-2-3010-8555    E-mail: asianspinejournal@gmail.com                
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
82, Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Korea
Tel: +82-31-966-3413    Fax: +82-2-831-3414    E-mail: office@spine.or.kr                

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next