Asian Spine J Search

CLOSE


Asian Spine J > Online first
Mastrokostas, Mastrokostas, Emara, Wellington, Ginalis, Houten, Khalsa, Saleh, Monsef, Razi, and Ng: Increasing public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery in the United States: higher search volumes in the Northeast region from 2015 to 2024

Abstract

Study Design

A cross-sectional study.

Purpose

This study aimed to investigate temporal patterns, seasonal variations, and geographic differences in the US public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery.

Overview of Literature

The number of lumbar decompression and fusion surgery procedures for various surgical indications has significantly increased in the United States over the past few decades. As the prevalence of these procedures increases, patients are increasingly seeking online information on these procedures.

Methods

This study analyzed US public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery using Google Trends data from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2024. The relative search volume (RSV) was used to measure public interest. Temporal trends were assessed using linear regression analysis, whereas seasonal and geographic variations were evaluated using analysis of variance and Tukey’s post hoc tests. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

Public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery showed a statistically significant upward trend from 2015 to 2024 (p<0.05), with R2 ranging from 0.0141 to 0.6748 across search terms. Monthly analysis revealed that the average search volume was highest in October (78.8%) and lowest in December (68.7%). No significant differences were observed among seasons (p=0.102). Geographically, the highest mean RSV was in the Northeast (43.3%), followed by the West (19.5%), Midwest (12.6%), South (11.1%), and Southwest (10.2%), with significant differences among these regions (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery has shown a consistent and statistically significant upward trend over the past decade. Although seasonal variation was not significant, notable geographic differences in search volume were observed, with the northeast showing the highest level of interest. These findings highlighted regional disparities in public engagement and may serve as a basis for future healthcare resource planning and patient education strategies.

Introduction

In the past few decades, the growing prevalence of degenerative spinal conditions has led to an increase in the number of lumbar decompression and fusion surgery procedures in the United States. In fact, the number of elective lumbar fusion surgeries for degenerative spinal diseases increased by 62.3%, from 122,679 cases in 2004 to 199,140 cases in 2015 [1]. These procedures are now among the most frequently performed surgical interventions for conditions, such as spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, and disc disorders [2,3]. The current situation has significant implications for healthcare resource allocation and surgical demand.
In parallel with the increased number of surgical interventions, patients have been relying on the internet for medical information. Data from multiple administrations of the Health Information National Trends Survey reveal that majority of people (69.8% to 81.5%) have searched for health or medical information online, with 68.9% reporting the internet as the first source during their most recent search [4]. This highlights the critical role of search engines in shaping healthcare-seeking behavior and public interest in medical procedures. Google Trends (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA) is a freely accessible online tool that allows analysis of the popularity of search terms, making it an ideal platform for evaluating public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery [5]. Previous studies have established a positive correlation between Google search volumes and actual healthcare utilization, suggesting that internet searches may serve as a proxy for patient demand [615].
Despite the growing use of Google Trends to assess public interest in healthcare topics, prior investigations on lumbar decompression and fusion surgery have primarily focused on short-term trends or specific events, such as the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic [6,7]. For example, Feng et al. [6] reported that within 30 days before the recommendation to halt elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic, the average interest, as measured in the relative search volume (RSV), significantly increased by nearly 10%. In another study by Michel et al. [7], the RSV for search terms associated with cervical and lumbar fusion substantially declined during the peak of the pandemic and was yet to reach the prepandemic level at 4 months after removal of elective surgery restrictions in the United States. However, these studies did not examine long-term trends and seasonal and geographic variations in public interest over a sustained period.
To address this gap, this study aimed to provide a comprehensive 10-year analysis of the US public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery. We investigated temporal patterns, seasonal variations, and geographic differences in search volumes using Google Trends data from 2015 to 2024. By exploring these dimensions, we sought to enhance our understanding of healthcare-seeking behavior and offer valuable insights for clinicians and healthcare administrators alike. The null hypothesis for this study was that there is no significant temporal, seasonal, or geographic variation in the US public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery, as measured by Google search volumes.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This study used publicly available anonymized data from Google Trends and did not involve human subjects or require institutional review board approval.

Study design

This cross-sectional study analyzed US public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2024.

Data source

Google Trends was used to assess the search interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery. Based on a comprehensive literature review, the search terms “lumbar decompression,” “lumbar discectomy,” “lumbar laminectomy,” “lumbar fusion,” “lumbar fusion surgery,” and “lumbar spinal fusion” were selected and entered into Google Trends to obtain RSV, which served as the measure of search popularity. Google Trends offers customizable options to analyze search trends based on time frame and geographic location. Google was chosen for this study, because it accounts for approximately 90% of internet search traffic in the United States, with Bing and Yahoo comprising only 6% and 3%, respectively. Data were collected from the five largest US cities, each representing a distinct region: Chicago, IL (Midwest); Houston, TX (South); Los Angeles, CA (West); New York, NY (Northeast); and Phoenix, AZ (Southwest). RSV was calculated for each city, and a maximum value of 100 represented the peak search volume within the specified time frame.

Outcomes

The primary outcomes were temporal trends, seasonal variations, and geographic differences in RSV for lumbar decompression and fusion surgery.

Statistical analysis

The relationship between RSV and temporal trends was assessed by linear regression using R statistical software ver. 4.3.1 (R Project for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). Seasonal variations were examined by grouping the mean RSV into Winter (December to February), Spring (March to May), Summer (June to August), and Fall (September to November) and performing analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Geographic differences in RSV were analyzed using ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test to determine significant regional variations. To ensure robust assessment of trends in public interest, model accuracy was evaluated using standard metrics, including mean absolute percentage error, mean absolute deviation, and mean squared deviation. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

Results

Temporal patterns

Throughout the study period, the search volume consistently increased across all generated models (Fig. 1), with mean absolute percentage errors ranging from 6.46% to 9.89%. Over time, the RSVs for “lumbar decompression,” “lumbar discectomy,” “lumbar fusion,” “lumbar fusion surgery,” and “lumbar spinal fusion” demonstrated significant upward trends (p<0.05 for all). The R2 values ranged from 0.0141 to 0.6748. The mean RSV was highest in October at 78.8% and lowest in December at 68.7% (Table 1).

Seasonal variations

The mean RSV for lumbar decompression and fusion peaked during the fall season at 77.1% and was lowest during the winter season at 72.4%, but it did not significantly differ among the seasons (fall, 77.1% vs. spring, 75.9% vs. summer, 76.4% vs. winter, 72.4%; p=0.102) (Table 2, Fig. 2).

Geographic differences

The RSVs for lumbar decompression and fusion significantly varied among the major US cities (p<0.001) (Table 3). New York, NY demonstrated the highest mean RSV at 43.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.4–46.2), which was significantly higher than that in all other cities. Los Angeles, CA had a higher mean RSV (19.5%; 95% CI, 17.5–21.6) than Chicago, IL (12.6%; 95% CI, 11.2–14.1); Houston, TX (11.1%; 95% CI, 9.26–12.9); and Phoenix, AZ (10.2%; 95% CI, 8.26–12.1). In addition, Chicago, IL had a significantly higher mean RSV than Phoenix, AZ, as indicated by the nonoverlapping confidence intervals (Fig. 3).

Discussion

With the increasing demand for elective lumbar fusion surgery, we used Google Trends to explore the temporal, seasonal, and geographical aspects of US public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery. Over a 10-year period, we observed a consistent upward trend in the RSV for “lumbar decompression,” “lumbar discectomy,” “lumbar laminectomy,” “lumbar fusion,” “lumbar fusion surgery,” and “lumbar spinal fusion.” Public interest peaked in the fall, with the monthly RSV being highest in October and lowest in December. Although seasonal fluctuations were observed, the differences were not significant. Regionally, the northeast exhibited the highest level of public interest and the southwest recorded the lowest RSV. These trends suggested that public engagement in lumbar fusion and decompression may reflect broader patterns of regional healthcare access, awareness, and demand.
We observed an upward trend over time in the RSV for the key search terms in this study. Although no studies have evaluated long-term trends in public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery, this observation was consistent with previously reported trends in neurosurgical procedures after the COVID-19 pandemic. A study by Feng et al. [6] revealed increased public interest, consistent with prepandemic trends, in all neurosurgical procedure categories after the removal of elective surgery restrictions and implementation of official reopening measures across the country. However, that study focused on the most popular spine-related search terms, such as “spinal fusion” and “laminectomy” [6]. The study by Feng et al. [6] provided insights based on a relatively short timeframe of assessing increased interest in spinal procedures after the pandemic, whereas our study highlighted a long-term increase in interest in lumbar decompression and fusion. Our findings may contribute to understanding the evolving trends in postpandemic interest in spinal procedures and reflected a relatively broad and long-term interest in these interventions.
We observed modest fluctuations in the seasonality of public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion, with the highest level observed in the fall and lowest in the winter. However, these seasonal differences were not significant. Although no studies have specifically examined the relationship between seasonality and elective spinal procedures, such as lumbar decompression and fusion, the interplay between seasonality and other elective procedures has been investigated. Shmelev et al. conducted a study using a Nationwide Inpatient Sample database of 18,050,726 elective general surgery procedures from 1988 to 2019 and found that summer months had peaks in appendectomy and cholecystectomy procedures [16]. Ng et al. [17] reported that complication rates after total hip or knee arthroplasty were higher during summer months than during winter months, potentially due to factors, such as new resident trainees in academic hospitals in summer. This underscored the potential impact of seasonal factors on healthcare-seeking behavior and offered physicians and hospital administrators valuable insights into possible healthcare demands during high-volume months or seasons.
We identified notable regional variations in public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion among major US cities. Compared with other regions, the northeast had the highest level of public interest. The West demonstrated moderate levels of interest, followed by the Midwest and South, whereas the Southwest recorded the lowest engagement. These patterns closely paralleled the findings of Moore et al. [18], who evaluated workforce trends in spinal surgery and found regional disparities in the availability of neurologic and orthopedic spine surgeons. During their study period, the number of spine surgeons substantially increased to 11.7% in the South and 17.8% in the Northeast and modestly increased to 4.8% and 5.8% in the Midwest and West, respectively [18]. These disparities in workforce availability may help explain the regional variation in public interest we observed. Areas with higher concentrations of spine specialists may naturally generate more patient engagement and health-related searches, whereas regions with fewer resources may lag in visibility and access. These findings highlighted the importance of aligning healthcare planning and resource allocation with public demand, particularly in high-growth regions.
Although our findings were robust, alternative explanations must be considered to comprehensively understand the observed trends. The upward trend in public interest may have reflected an increase in lumbar spine surgeries and could have been influenced by greater public awareness through media coverage, public health campaigns, or changes in insurance policies, which have made spinal procedures more accessible or visible. Moreover, broader internet access and increased use of online resources for health information over the last decade may have contributed to the increase in search volumes. Geographic differences may have been influenced by disparities in healthcare access. Regions with higher concentrations of spine specialists and healthcare resources may have better patient engagement in health-related information, whereas areas with fewer healthcare resources may have reduced search volume for elective surgeries, such as lumbar fusion. Seasonal variations could have been affected by factors, such as elective surgery scheduling, patient behavior during holidays, and changes in healthcare system capacity, which may influence the timing of seeking or planning medical procedures.
This study had some limitations. Although Google Trends offers valuable insights into public interest in medical procedures and captures approximately 90% of the internet search traffic, it cannot account for searches on “lumbar decompression,” “lumbar discectomy,” “lumbar laminectomy,” “lumbar fusion,” “lumbar fusion surgery,” and “lumbar spinal fusion” in other search engines [19]. In addition, not all search terms in this study provided state-specific data; therefore, mean RSVs were calculated based on the available search terms for a given state. Google Trends lacked demographic data of the internet users included in this study, making it challenging to determine whether the sample represented the entire US population. Furthermore, changes in healthcare policy, insurance reimbursement, and population demographics over the study period, as well as regional differences in healthcare access, could have influenced search behaviors. These factors, along with the lack of correlation between search volume and actual surgical volume, limit the conclusions on healthcare utilization based on search trends alone. Finally, although RSV was used to measure public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion, a direct connection between this interest and actual performance of these procedures cannot be established. Future studies should correlate search data with clinical data to provide more definitive insights into healthcare-seeking behavior.

Conclusions

Our study reflected a 10-year sustained and growing public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery, with the highest rate observed in the northeast and lowest in the southwest. These patterns paralleled the known disparities in spine surgeon availability and highlighted the importance of aligning healthcare planning with regional demand. Overall, this study offered insights into how geographic factors shape public interest in lumbar spine surgery and underscored the need for regionally tailored strategies for healthcare delivery. Future research should further investigate the influence of sociodemographic variables, such as income, education, and employment, to better understand evolving trends in spine care engagement.

Key Points

  • Public interest in lumbar decompression and fusion surgery significantly increased for 10 years from 2015 to 2024.

  • The mean relative search volume was highest in the northeast and lowest in the southwest, reflecting significant regional disparities in public interest.

  • Although interest varied by month, no significant differences were observed among seasons.

  • These findings highlighted regional trends in public engagement in spine surgery and can serve as a reference for healthcare planning, patient education, and resource allocation strategies.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

Mitchell K. Ng is a paid consultant at Johnson & Johnson Ethicon Inc., CurvaFix Inc., Pacira BioSciences Inc., Sage Products Inc., Alafair Biosciences Inc., Next Science LLC, Bonutti Technologies Inc., Hippocrates Opportunities Fund LLC, and Ferghana Partners Inc. Otherwise, no potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions

Conception and design: PGM, LEM, AKE, IJW, EG, JKH, ASK, AS, JBM, AER, MKN. Data acquisition: PGM, LEM. Analysis of data: PGM, LEM, MKN. Drafting of the manuscript: PGM, LEM, AKE, IJW, EG. Critical revision: JKH, ASK, AS, JBM, AER, MKN. Obtaining funding: none. Administrative support: JBM, AER, MKN. Supervision: JBM, AER, MKN. Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

Fig. 1
(A–F) Linear trend models for “lumbar decompression,” “lumbar discectomy,” “lumbar laminectomy,” “lumbar fusion,” “lumbar fusion surgery,” and “lumbar spinal fusion” search terms. MAPE, mean absolute percentage error; MAD, mean absolute deviation; MSD, mean squared deviation.
asj-2025-0133f1.jpg
Fig. 2
Bar graphs depicting mean Google Trends search volumes across seasons: fall, spring, summer, and winter.
asj-2025-0133f2.jpg
Fig. 3
Bar graphs depicting mean Google Trends search volumes across major cities in the United States: Chicago, IL; Houston, TX; Los Angeles, CA; New York, NY; and Phoenix, AZ.
asj-2025-0133f3.jpg
Table 1
Monthly Google Trends search volumes for lumbar decompression and fusion
Month Mean Google Trends search volumes (% relative to peak)
January 71.2
February 77.4
March 76.2
April 76.3
May 75.2
June 77.9
July 74.3
August 77.0
September 76.6
October 78.8
November 76.0
December 68.7
Table 2
Seasonal Google Trends search volumes for lumbar decompression and fusion
Season Mean Google Trends search volumes (% relative to peak) 95% CI p-value
Fall 77.1 74.8–79.4 0.102
Spring 75.9 72.0–79.8
Summer 76.4 74.1–78.7
Winter 72.4 69.5–75.4

CI, confidence interval.

Table 3
Google Trends search volumes for lumbar decompression and fusion by major city
Major city Mean Google Trends search volumes (% relative to peak) 95% CI p-valuea)
Chicago, IL 12.6 11.2–14.1 <0.001
Houston, TX 11.1 9.26–12.9
Los Angeles, CA 19.5 17.5–21.6
New York, NY 43.3 40.4–46.2
Phoenix, AZ 10.2 8.26–12.1

CI, confidence interval.

a) Bolded p-value indicates statistical significance.

References

1. Martin BI, Mirza SK, Spina N, Spiker WR, Lawrence B, Brodke DS. Trends in lumbar fusion procedure rates and associated hospital costs for degenerative spinal diseases in the United States, 2004 to 2015. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2019;44:369–76.
crossref pmid
2. Yavin D, Casha S, Wiebe S, et al. Lumbar fusion for degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurgery 2017;80:701–15.
crossref pmid pdf
3. Deyo RA, Nachemson A, Mirza SK. Spinal-fusion surgery: the case for restraint. N Engl J Med 2004;350:722–6.
crossref pmid
4. Finney Rutten LJ, Blake KD, et al. Online health information seeking among US adults: measuring progress toward a healthy people 2020 objective. Public Health Rep 2019;134:617–25.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. FAQ about Google Trends data [Internet] Mountain View (CA): Trends Help. date unknown [cited 2023 Sep 15]. Available from: https://support.google.com/trends/answer/4365533?hl%C2%BCen

6. Feng AY, Garcia CA, Jin MC, et al. An analysis of public interest in elective neurosurgical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic through online search engine trends. World Neurosurg 2021;148:e282–93.
crossref pmid pmc
7. Michel CR, Dijanic C, Sudah S, Kerrigan D, Cohen J. Has public interest in elective spine surgery returned to pre-COVID 19 levels?: a google trends analysis. Cureus 2022;14:e22858.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Laubach L, Chiang B, Sharma V, Jacobs J, Krumme JW, Kuester V. Alternative and adjunct treatments for scoliosis: a google trends analysis of public popularity compared with scientific literature. Cureus 2023;15:e38682.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Cohen SA, Zhuang T, Xiao M, Michaud JB, Amanatullah DF, Kamal RN. Google Trends analysis shows increasing public interest in platelet-rich plasma injections for hip and knee osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2021;36:3616–22.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Strotman PK, Novicoff WM, Nelson SJ, Browne JA. Increasing public interest in stem cell injections for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee: a Google Trends analysis. J Arthroplasty 2019;34:1053–7.
crossref pmid
11. Tijerina JD, Cohen SA, Parham MJ, et al. Public interest in elective orthopedic surgery following recommendations during COVID-19: a Google Trends analysis. Cureus 2020;12:e12123.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Snyder A, Lanuti M, Muniappan A, Price MC, Som A, Little BP. Assessing public interest in elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a Google Trends analysis. Ann Surg Open 2022;3:e142.
pmid pmc
13. Manstein SM, Elmer N, Comer CD, et al. Public confidence for undergoing elective plastic surgery procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2022;10:e4522.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Bhambhvani HP, Tijerina JD, Parham MJ, Greenberg DR, Eisenberg ML. Public interest in elective urological procedures in the COVID-19 pandemic: a Google Trends analysis. Urol Pract 2020;7:496–501.
crossref pmid
15. Mohty KM, Lashkari N, Gittings DJ, Bell JA, Stevanovic M, Nicholson LT. Utilizing Google Trends to track online interest in elective hand surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus 2021;13:e17313.
crossref pmid pmc
16. Shmelev A, Schwarzova K, Cunningham SC. Seasonality in general surgery hospitalizations and procedures in the US: workflow implications. J Surg Res 2023;288:51–63.
crossref pmid
17. Ng M, Song S, George J, et al. Associations between seasonal variation and post-operative complications after total hip arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 2017;5(Suppl 3): S33.
crossref pmid pmc
18. Moore ML, Singh R, McQueen K, et al. Workforce trends in spinal surgery: geographic distribution and primary specialty characteristics from 2012 to 2017. World Neurosurg 2021;156:e392–7.
crossref pmid
19. Google Search Statistics [Internet] [place unknown]: Internet Live Stats. date unknown [cited 2023 Sep 22]. Available from: https://www.internetlivestats.com/google-search-statistics/

TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 1,214 View
  • 10 Download
Related articles in ASJ


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3010-3530    Fax: +82-2-3010-8555    E-mail: asianspinejournal@gmail.com                
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
82, Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Korea
Tel: +82-31-966-3413    Fax: +82-2-831-3414    E-mail: office@spine.or.kr                

Copyright © 2025 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next