Asian Spine J Search

CLOSE


Asian Spine J > Volume 20(1); 2026 > Article
Veerasatian, Rattanapitoon, Thanchonnang, and Rattanapitoon: Letter to the editor: Beyond fixation: computational and motion-integrated perspectives on pinless robot-assisted spine surgery
To the Editor,
We read with great interest the article by Soni et al. [1], and the authors should be commended for achieving remarkably high pedicle-screw accuracy in such a large cohort. Their findings mark a meaningful step toward simplifying robotic workflows and expanding accessibility to image-guided spine surgery. Their work provides an important opportunity to further examine how fixation-free navigation can be optimized under real-world intraoperative conditions.
First, while the study demonstrates that bone-mounted fixation is not indispensable, the absence of an active motion-tracking safeguard raises concern regarding intraoperative registration drift. Even minimal patient or table displacement—imperceptible to the surgical team—may induce submillimetric coordinate deviation. Integrating accelerometer-based or artificial intelligence-supported drift-prediction models may allow dynamic recalibration of the robotic arm during screw insertion [2,3], reframing precision as an adaptive computational process rather than a purely mechanical one.
Second, the applicability of pinless navigation across diverse spinal morphologies warrants deeper evaluation. Thoracic deformity, rotational asymmetry, and complex three-dimensional anatomy introduce challenges that may not be fully represented in the reported cohort. Automated error mapping or learning-based adjustment algorithms—validated across multicenter datasets—could clarify the boundaries of morphological robustness for pinless systems [4].
Third, although workflow efficiency is an important outcome, time reduction should not be the sole indicator of progress. For real-world adoption, robotic platforms must demonstrate stability under dynamic intraoperative conditions, cost neutrality, and reduced cognitive load for the surgical team [5,6]. A motion-integrated ecosystem combining optical feedback, inertial sensing, and predictive analytics may redefine the operational meaning of “pinless precision.”
In summary, Soni et al. [1] have advanced the dialogue on fixation-free robotic guidance. We propose that the next frontier lies not merely in eliminating fixation, but in enabling the robot to sense, adapt, and learn—transforming pinless navigation into a self-correcting, computationally intelligent system.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Acknowledgments

The authors used ChatGPT (OpenAI, San Francisco, CA, USA) solely for language editing and grammar checking under author supervision.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: TV, SKR. Data curation: TV, SKR, NKR. Formal analysis: TV, SKR, CT, NKR. Writing–original draft: TV, SKR, CT, NKR. Writing–review & editing: TV, SKR, CT, NKR. Supervision: NKR. Final approval of the manuscript: all authors.

References

1. Soni A, Srinivasa V, Thirugnanam B, Kanhangad MP, Joseph AX. Evaluating the feasibility of pinless robot-assisted spine surgery: a prospective study of 750 cases and 3,924 screws in the thoracolumbar spine in India. Asian Spine J 2025;19:689–97. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0066
crossref pmid pmc
2. Vardiman AB, Wallace DJ, Booher GA, Toossi N, Bucklen BS. Decreasing the pedicle screw misplacement rate in the thoracic spine with robot-guided navigation. Clin Spine Surg 2023;36:431–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000001474
crossref pmid pmc
3. Huang M, Tetreault TA, Vaishnav A, York PJ, Staub BN. The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery. Ann Transl Med 2021;9:86. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07
crossref pmid pmc
4. Tovar MA, Dowlati E, Zhao DY, et al. Robot-assisted and augmented reality-assisted spinal instrumentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of screw accuracy and outcomes over the last decade. J Neurosurg Spine 2022;37:299–314. https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.1.spine211345
crossref pmid
5. Avrumova F, Sivaganesan A, Alluri RK, Vaishnav A, Qureshi S, Lebl DR. Workflow and efficiency of robotic-assisted navigation in spine surgery. HSS J 2021;17:302–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316211026658
crossref pmid pmc
6. Staub BN, Sadrameli SS. The use of robotics in minimally invasive spine surgery. J Spine Surg 2019;5:S31–40. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2019.04.16
crossref pmid pmc


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3010-3530    Fax: +82-2-3010-8555    E-mail: asianspinejournal@gmail.com                
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
82, Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Korea
Tel: +82-31-966-3413    Fax: +82-2-831-3414    E-mail: office@spine.or.kr                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next