Asian Spine J Search

CLOSE


Asian Spine J > Volume 20(3); 2026 > Article
T K, Gaur, Sheenam, and Ghosh: Letter to the editor: Efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for the treatment of neurogenic claudication in lumbar spinal stenosis: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial
Dear Editor,
We read with great interest the article by Chotigavanichaya et al. [1]. The authors are to be commended for conducting a high-quality study. Despite these contributions, certain methodological considerations deserve attention.
Firstly, participants received naproxen and structured physiotherapy, which may have obscured any additional benefit of gabapentinoids, and the absence of detailed reporting on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs duration, adherence, stopping rules, and related adverse events further limits interpretation, particularly in older adults. Although adverse events were described as tolerable, they occurred in most actively treated patients and 17 participants were lost to followup without explanation, raising uncertainty about true tolerability [2].
Neurogenic claudication is multifactorial, yet the study did not employ neuropathic pain screening tools to identify patients with a predominant neuropathic component who might preferentially benefit from gabapentinoids, and the mandated rapid escalation to fixed target doses within 14 days without allowance for halting titration upon early clinical response deviates from usual practice of individualizing therapy to the lowest effective dose, a strategy that in this older cohort may have contributed to higher rates of dizziness and sedation and potentially obscured benefit in early responders, as dose- or response-stratified analyses and more gradual titration schedules might have yielded different tolerability, adherence, and efficacy outcomes.
The cohort in this study is anatomically heterogeneous, with varying numbers of affected levels and differing central canal and lateral recess severity, yet no prespecified stratification or subgroup analyses were performed; this weakens the post hoc claim that null results reflect predominantly mechanical pathology rather than differential responses across anatomical phenotypes [3,4].
While the study offers valuable randomized data, attention to co-interventions, titration strategy, and anatomical heterogeneity is essential before concluding that gabapentinoids lack benefit in neurogenic claudication, as these factors may influence treatment response and clinical applicability.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author Contributions

All the authors have equal contribution in conception, drafting and revision of this Letter.

References

1. Chotigavanichaya C, Mekariya K, Santipas B, et al. Efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for the treatment of neurogenic claudication in lumbar spinal stenosis: a doubleblind randomized placebo-controlled trial. Asian Spine J 2025;19:916–27. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0096
crossref pmid pmc
2. Bally M, Dendukuri N, Rich B, et al. Risk of acute myocardial infarction with NSAIDs in real world use: Bayesian meta-analysis of individual patient data. BMJ 2017;357:j1909. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j1909
crossref pmid pmc
3. Schizas C, Theumann N, Burn A, et al. Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:1919–24. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd
crossref pmid
4. Splettstoßer A, Khan MF, Zimmermann B, et al. Correlation of lumbar lateral recess stenosis in magnetic resonance imaging and clinical symptoms. World J Radiol 2017;9:223–9. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v9.i5.223
crossref pmid pmc
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •   Scopus
  • 1,534 View
  • 45 Download
Related articles in ASJ

Response to the letter to the editor: Efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for the treatment of neurogenic claudication in lumbar spinal stenosis: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial2026 June;20(3)

Response to the letter to the editor: Methodological considerations on “Comparison of dexmedetomidine and morphine versus plain ropivacaine 0.2% for myofascial infiltration in thoracolumbar spinal fusion: a double-blind randomized trial”2026 June;20(3)

Letter to the editor: Methodological considerations on “Comparison of dexmedetomidine and morphine versus plain ropivacaine 0.2% for myofascial infiltration in thoracolumbar spinal fusion: a double-blind randomized trial”2026 June;20(3)

Response to the letter to the editor: Effect of mechanical bowel preparation with antibiotics and probiotics on postoperative ileus in patients undergoing posterior lumbar spine surgeries: a randomized controlled trial2026 June;20(3)

Efficacy of gabapentin and pregabalin for the treatment of neurogenic claudication in lumbar spinal stenosis: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial2025 December;19(6)



ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine
88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea
Tel: +82-2-3010-3530    Fax: +82-2-3010-8555    E-mail: asianspinejournal@gmail.com                
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
82, Gumi-ro 173beon-gil, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, 13620, Korea
Tel: +82-31-966-3413    Fax: +82-2-831-3414    E-mail: office@spine.or.kr                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next