1. Fehlings MG, Tetreault L, Nater A, et al. The aging of the global population: the changing epidemiology of disease and spinal disorders. Neurosurgery 2015 77(Suppl 4): S1–S5. PMID:
26378347.
2. O’Lynnger TM, Zuckerman SL, Morone PJ, Dewan MC, Vasquez-Castellanos RA, Cheng JS. Trends for spine surgery for the elderly: implications for access to Healthcare in North America. Neurosurgery 2015 77(Suppl 4): S136–S141. PMID:
26378351.
3. Iizuka Y, Iizuka H, Mieda T, Tajika T, Yamamoto A, Takagishi K. Epidemiology and associated radiographic spinopelvic parameters of symptomatic degenerative lumbar scoliosis: are radiographic spinopelvic parameters associated with the presence of symptoms or decreased quality of life in degenerative lumbar scoliosis? Eur Spine J 2016 25:2514–2519. PMID:
26423747.
4. Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, et al. The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 2013 73:559–568. PMID:
23756751.
5. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 34:E599–E606. PMID:
19644319.
6. Schwab F, Patel A, Ungar B, Farcy JP, Lafage V. Adult spinal deformity-postoperative standing imbalance: how much can you tolerate? An overview of key parameters in assessing alignment and planning corrective surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35:2224–2231. PMID:
21102297.
7. Blondel B, Schwab F, Patel A, et al. Sacro-femoral-pubic angle: a coronal parameter to estimate pelvic tilt. Eur Spine J 2012 21:719–724. PMID:
22113529.
8. Bao H, Liu Z, Zhu F, et al. Is the sacro-femoral-pubic angle predictive for pelvic tilt in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients? J Spinal Disord Tech 2014 27:E176–E180. PMID:
24525746.
9. Hu J, Ji ML, Qian BP, et al. Can pelvic tilt be predicated by the sacrofemoral-pubic angel in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014 39:E1347–E1352. PMID:
25365717.
10. Liu Z, Bao H, Qiu Y, et al. Evaluation of demographic factors affecting predictability of the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in healthy adolescents. J Anat 2015 226:163–168. PMID:
25469639.
11. Ghandhari H, Fouladi DF, Safari MB, Ameri E. Correlation between pelvic tilt and the sacro-femoral-pubic angle in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, patients with congenital scoliosis, and healthy individuals. Eur Spine J 2016 25:394–400. PMID:
25893338.
12. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37:1077–1082. PMID:
22045006.
13. Lonner BS, Auerbach JD, Sponseller P, Rajadhyaksha AD, Newton PO. Variations in pelvic and other sagittal spinal parameters as a function of race in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010 35:E374–E377. PMID:
20139806.
14. Zarate-Kalfopulos B, Romero-Vargas S, Otero-Camara E, Correa VC, Reyes-Sanchez A. Differences in pelvic parameters among Mexican, Caucasian, and Asian populations. J Neurosurg Spine 2012 16:516–519. PMID:
22385086.
15. Yong Q, Zhen L, Zezhang Z, et al. Comparison of sagittal spinopelvic alignment in Chinese adolescents with and without idiopathic thoracic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012 37:E714–E720. PMID:
22166928.
16. Zhu Z, Xu L, Zhu F, et al. Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis in asymptomatic adults: norms in Chinese populations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2014 39:E1–E6. PMID:
24270931.
17. Mac-Thiong JM, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Guigui P. Age- and sex-related variations in sagittal sacropelvic morphology and balance in asymptomatic adults. Eur Spine J 2011 20(Suppl 5): 572–577.
18. Katada S, Ando K,A rontgenographic evaluation of the indices for hip dysplasia in children influenced by pelvic tilt. Ueno R, Akamatsu N, Itami Y, , editors. The hip: clinical studies and basic research. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica; 1984. p.137–140.
19. Thoren B, Sahlstedt B. Influence of pelvic position on radiographic measurements of the prosthetic acetabular component. An experimental study on a pelvic model. Acta Radiol 1990 31:133–136. PMID:
2372455.
20. Kojima A, Nakagawa T, Tohkura A. Simulation of acetabular coverage of femoral head using anteroposterior pelvic radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1998 117:330–336. PMID:
9709845.
21. Nishihara S, Sugano N, Nishii T, Ohzono K, Yoshikawa H. Measurements of pelvic flexion angle using three-dimensional computed tomography. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 (411): 140–151. PMID:
12782869.
22. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2003 (407): 241–248.
23. Tannast M, Murphy SB, Langlotz F, Anderson SE, Siebenrock KA. Estimation of pelvic tilt on anteroposterior X-rays: a comparison of six parameters. Skeletal Radiol 2006 35:149–155. PMID:
16365745.
24. Raux S, Abelin-Genevois K, Blondel B, Mancini J, Jouve JL. Estimation of sagittal pelvic orientation from frontal standard radiograph using the sacral-femoral-pubic angle: feasibility study in the pediatric population. Eur Spine J 2015 24:1143–1147. PMID:
24925286.
25. Pullen WM, Henebry A, Gaskill T. Variability of acetabular coverage between supine and weightbearing pelvic radiographs. Am J Sports Med 2014 42:2643–2648. PMID:
25214530.